Re: Muon paradox

Tom Roberts wrote:

this is blatantly incorrectuous. They never know how many muons are
there, due quantum probability distribution. So your assumed energy
makes no sense. Not even for detection.

 
Au contraire, it is you who are 'blatantly incorrectuous', [sic]
and you obviously have no idea of what you are talking about.
It is easy to measure how many muons there are in the storage ring at
any given moment, by picking up their electromagnetic fields,

 
Yes.
Moreover, to measure the RATE of decay, one need not know the number of
muons circulating, one merely needs to measure the number of decays as a
function of time. Bailey et al naturally do that, as part of their
measurement of g-2.

indeed, your yes looks like a no, admitting what is been said above.