Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)
De : physfitfreak (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Physfitfreak)
Groupes : sci.physics sci.physics.relativity sci.math
Date : 19. Apr 2025, 20:37:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Modern Human
Message-ID : <vu0u1u$8ffc$1@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/19/25 1:59 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
    An Iranian more independent and self-centered news outlet (in Telegram) which does not necessarily obey any demands on them by Iran's government, early on, towards the beginning of the talk disclosed that Araghchi and his team had cancelled the talk minutes into its start, and for about 15 minutes or so were preparing to leave the building (Ommani embassy in Italy) and return to Iran.
 This news piece was not touched on at the end of the 2nd rounds talks by spokesperson of foreign ministry. No other Iranian sources of news also touched on that, either because they didn't have the information, or they followed ministry's directive in keeping it quiet. No news of it in Western outlets that I could see either.
          
In this round of talk, no reporters were allowed in the building. Even spokesperson himself wasn't allowed to be there. And I don't think anyone among Iran's team texted this out directly to that news agency. It'd be absurd to do that. Much more likely, Araghchi himself called up other Iran's authorities to ask for permission to abort, and it was granted. Then some Iranians in the government itself immediately leaked it to that news agency against the wishes of the government.
There's a second route also. Perhaps some Mossad agent among Americans' team texted it out to Mossad, and Iran's spies among Mossad (plenty of them!) texted it to that news agency and perhaps scores of other ones as well, then only the most independent one disclosed it in Telegram. I think these two are the only routes that the news could take to come out.
I saw the news piece just minutes after the attempt to abort took place! I.e. during those minutes that mission was aborted. This is a bit too fast to be normal reaction on either side. I think there's more to it than it seems.
How it was handled _after_ 2nd round was over, was of course just correct diplomatic behavior preserving both sides' face. Such nitty gritties are washed and cleaned off before news to media is given. But the fact that somebody, some side, wanted very badly and quickly for it to come out, is the strange and interesting part of it :)
Could be that somebody will explain this in the news for a wider audience. We'll see.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
16 Apr 25 * Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)49Physfitfreak
17 Apr 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)9Physfitfreak
17 Apr 25 i+- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Thomas Heger
17 Apr 25 i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)7Physfitfreak
17 Apr 25 i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
17 Apr 25 i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Physfitfreak
17 Apr 25 i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Physfitfreak
18 Apr 25 i    +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
18 Apr 25 i    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
18 Apr 25 i     `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
19 Apr 25 `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)39Physfitfreak
19 Apr 25  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)38Physfitfreak
19 Apr 25   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)37Physfitfreak
19 Apr 25    +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
20 Apr 25    i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Physfitfreak
20 Apr 25    i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Physfitfreak
20 Apr 25    i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
20 Apr 25    i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
20 Apr 25    i    `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
21 Apr 25    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)30Physfitfreak
21 Apr 25     `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)29Physfitfreak
21 Apr 25      `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)28Physfitfreak
23 Apr 25       `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)27Physfitfreak
23 Apr 25        +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
23 Apr 25        `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)25Physfitfreak
24 Apr 25         `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)24Physfitfreak
24 Apr 25          +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
25 Apr 25          i`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
26 Apr 25          `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)21Thomas Heger
26 Apr 25           +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)19bertietaylor
2 May 25           i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)18Thomas Heger
4 May 25           i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)17Bertitaylor
6 May 25           i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)16Thomas Heger
7 May 25           i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)15Bertitaylor
7 May 25           i    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)14Thomas Heger
7 May 25           i     `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)13Bertitaylor
8 May 25           i      +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Thomas Heger
8 May 25           i      i+- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
8 May 25           i      i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Johnie Medved Schepatov
9 May 25           i      i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Thomas Heger
9 May 25           i      i  `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Kelley Balakirev
9 May 25           i      `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)7Thomas Heger
9 May 25           i       +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Bertitaylor
10 May 25           i       i+- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Thomas Heger
10 May 25           i       i`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
9 May 25           i       `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
10 May 25           i        `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Thomas Heger
10 May 25           i         `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Larkin Hadonov
27 Apr 25           `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal