Re: What is a photon

On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 10:52:56 +0000, rhertz wrote:

On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 3:13:59 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote:
>

On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 1:07:24 +0000, rhertz wrote:
>

This is MY DEFINITION of what a photon is, which merges Maxwell and
Planck:
>
A photon (Planck) is a ray of light (Maxwell), which is:
>
 - Self-propelled point-like particle that is the least component of
light itself.

>
Rubbish. Point particles can not bend nicely in denser medium. They
cannot have interference patterns. They cannot be polarized. They cannot
get a uniform phase front as in laser or maser. They cannot diffract.
There is no way they can create standing wave patterns.

>
>
>
>
Bertietaylor, YOUR LACK OF CRITICAL THINKING AND MULTIDIMENSIONAL
ANALYSIS IS APPALLING. YOU NEED TO RESET YOURSELF AND FIND OUT WHAT IS
WRONG WITH YOUR MIND.

We the heavendogs of divine Arindam are perfectly sane and sound; you
apes are crazy, if not cunning parasitic apes howling out lies for
funding.

>
IT'S NOT THE POINT-LIKE PARTICLE WHICH BENDS OR CREATE INTERFERENCE
PATTERNS, MAN.

Certainly not.

>
IT'S DUE TO THEIR ASSOCIATED ELECTRICAL AND MAGNETIC FIELDS, WHICH ARE
SELF-GENERATED AND SELF-SUSTAINED FOREVER, ACROSS HUGE DISTANCES OF
BILLIONS OF LY.

There are no particles, foolish ape. There are only disturbances of
travelling amplitude/frequency varying electric and magnetic fields in
the medium of aether. What you call a particle is nothing but a brief
electromagnetic pulse caused by distortions of the electronic orbits in
atoms, for light. For gamma rays that is because of the very small
distances between the nucleus and the escaping electrons. For low
frequncies the distances involved are large and so the electric fields
are easy to detect along the radiator, or associated transmission line
(VSWR measurements involving slotted coaxial cable).

>
WHEN TRESPASSING MEDIUMS ON ITS LONG JOURNEY ON SPACE, BOTH FIELDS ADAPT
TO CORRECT THE SPEED OF SUCH PARTICLE (AKA PHOTON).

Rubbish, blah, nonsense, brainwashed aether denying fool.

>
ALWAYS, SINCE 1865 AND 1901, BOTH THEORIES WERE THE EXACT REPRESENTATION
OF A TOP-DOWN APPROACH (MAXWELL) AND A BOTTOM-UP APPROACH (PLANCK).

Planck is rubbish, those apes did not have a clue about antenna theory.
Arindam easily explained the photoelectric effect with antenna theory.
NO need for quantum bunkum. You silly apes have no clue about energy,
really. Whereas Arindam has united all forces as electric, explained the
cause of gravity, novas and supernovas.

>
THAT YOU CAN'T SEE IT OR UNDERSTAND IT SHOWS THAT YOU ARE NOT A DEEP
THINKER, AND I PITY YOU FOR IT.

Arindam is the greatest of all time as a genius, and as a physicist he
comes after Newton. The Newton-Arindam laws of motion will take humanity
to the stars or at least to the Moon, hopefully in Arindam's lifetime.
You miserable aether-denying apes have your cowardice and conformity and
careerism - so predictable.

>
GIVE YOURSELF A CHANCE TO UNDERSTAND BOTH MODELS SIMULTANEOUSLY, AND
YOU'LL FIND THE TRUTH THAT HAS BEEN NEGLECTED FOR A CENTURY, DUE TO
FUCKING IMBECILES LIKE THE QUANTUM GUYS, WHO PRETENDED (VERY ENCOURAGED)
TO UNDERSTAND THE WORLD IN A WAY MUCH MORE COMPLEX THAN WHAT IS NEEDED.
>
EITHER IN RADIO ENGINEERING OR IN QUANTUM PHYSICS, THE FUNDAMENTALS ARE
THE SAME. THIS IS WHAT ALLOWED PROGRESS IN PHOTONICS AS WELL AS ANYTHING
RELATED TO RADIO TELECOM, RANGING, ETC.

What a confused ape you are!  Get this clear - thermodynamics is wrong,
relativity is depravity and quantum is bunkum. Nature is not
schizophrenic; so do not give that quality to the most important aspect
of Nature - light! Light thus cannot be a particle or a wave, depending
upon mood of the pseudoscientist who will for his funding from the
Abrahmics_allsorts deny the existence of aum, or aether.
Woof woof woof woof woo
Bertietaylor

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

>
 - It's a carrier of energy (Planck) that is emitted/absorbed by
electrons that
   are orbiting atoms, which have different levels of energy.

>
Forget energy. That is trader talk from Jewish physics. It is force that
is the keyword. Aether is back thanks to Arindam and all the
extraordinary bungling wrapped by math gibberish is out.

>
 - It's created as if space of any kind (Maxwell) IGNITES under such
discharge
   causing that the point-like energy oscillates with electric and
magnetic fields
   in quadrature, with speed depending on the refraction index of the
media.

>
Blah
>
WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
>
Bertietaylor

>
- Under classic physics (Maxwell, unaware of Planck discovery) photons
are not
  perceived as a sum of enormous amounts of ray of light (each ray
linked to a
  bounded electron). On the opposite side, under Planck vision, light is
composed
  of a large amount of photons, each one with energy E=hf.
>
- The confusion between classic and quantum physics is due to the
interpretation
  of what light is. In Maxwell's world, light is the sum (coherent or
not) of huge
  amounts of ray of light (each one a photon), and is expressed in terms
of energy
  per unit area. In Planck's world, light is the sum (coherent or not)
of huge
  amount of photons, each one carrying energy E=hf.
>
- The speed of the photon or the ray of light is defined by Maxwell, in
terms of
  the permittivity and permeability of the medium. The collision of the
emitted
  energy per atom is what ignites the medium, creating the point-like
particle.
>
- The classic representation of light as a sinusoidal wave is just an
abstraction
  used for more than a century, representing the behavior of the
electrical field.
>
- There is not a dual behavior of light. This "paradox" is caused by the
confusion
  when light is analyzed entirely (Maxwell) or at its least expression
(Planck).
  Top-down versus bottom-up appreciation of light.
>
- But the point-like structure (the photon) has always been there since
1865-
>
>
Absolute truth has been spoken.

>
--

--