Re: The Apollo moon landings

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: The Apollo moon landings
De : clzb93ynxj (at) *nospam* att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.math
Date : 14. Jun 2025, 05:17:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <6434ec1576769c686742c4ed2fe52a48@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 0:11:55 +0000, rhertz wrote:

Explain the infamous conference of Neil Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins,
where they looked like dead inside. They didn't even smile once, and the
guilt and shame was all over them. Why did this happen for more than 2
hours,
>
By far, not the happiest men in the world, having conquered the Moon,
isn't it?
>
>
>
>
Apollo 11 Post Flight Press Conference (1969)
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvg5UBdiIHs
The usual "skeptic" is someone who defends the consensus of
professionals by means of an either-or dichotomy between "science" and
"pseudoscience" relying on appeal to "authority" while ridiculing
critics. It's lucky the moon landings succeeded if they tried to rely on
relativity!

Date Sujet#  Auteur
8 Jun 25 * Re: The Apollo moon landings6Powell Speech-language pathologists Ban
9 Jun 25 `* Re: The Apollo moon landings5rhertz
9 Jun 25  +* Re: The Apollo moon landings2Thomas Heger
10 Jun 25  i`- Re: The Apollo moon landings1Bertitaylor
14 Jun 25  `* Re: The Apollo moon landings2LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25   `- Re: The Apollo moon landings1Thomas Heger

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal