Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique

On 6/22/25 5:30 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/22/2025 4:09 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/22/25 10:46 AM, olcott wrote:

On 6/22/2025 6:23 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/21/25 6:48 PM, olcott wrote:

int DD()
{
   int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}
>
https://chatgpt.com/s/t_6857335b37a08191a077d57039fa4a76
ChatGPT agrees that I have correctly refuted every
halting problem proof technique that relies on the above
pattern.
>

>
Just shows your natural stupidity in believing a lie you convinced the artificial inteligence to say.
>
Sorry, I guess you natural stupidity extends to the failure to understand that AI's are programmed to have no problem with LYING, but are really just glorified "Yes Men", who will say what your prompt directs them to say.
>

>
MIT Technology Review
https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/03/04/1089403/large-language- models-amazing-but-nobody-knows-why/
>

>
>
Which doesn't make a claim that their answers are without error.
>

 I was not rebutting this and you know it.
 

It sure seemed like you were, since you seemed to have been using it as a rebuttal to the fact that AI's LIE.
I guess you are just admitting that a non-sequitor can be used as a refutation of an error being pointed out.
Not understanding how they work is not a good argument that they must be thought of as reliable.
I guess you are really showing that you have no idea at all about what you are talking about.