Sujet : Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
De : bertietaylor (at) *nospam* myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.mathDate : 02. Jul 2025, 03:21:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Rocksolid Light
Message-ID : <fc75bf5eb376b16c28d618b8592db115@www.novabbs.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Wed, 2 Jul 2025 1:39:01 +0000, Python wrote:
Le 02/07/2025 à 02:45, bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) a écrit :
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 0:55:03 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 0:11:53 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
>
If A is atomic weight and N is atomic number then the number of
electrons E holding the N protons in the nucleus is
>
E = A - N
>
Now E may not be an integer. That indicates the electrons for a
particular atom nucleus do not have unit charge on the average.
>
Woof woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof nice to have one's own formula!
>
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)
>
--
>
All agree, yes?
>
--
>
Yes, everyone agrees that you are quite insane, Arindam.
>
Everyone with sense and honesty agreed that Einsteinians are liars and
frauds.
>
No. Everyone with a brain recognize Arindam (you, sock puppet) as a
demented crank.
>
WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
>
Shitting and pissing on the floor won't help, Arindam.
Yet another abusive ape. Never any shortage of these.
Woof
-- 
Bertietaylor 's formula
Re: Bertietaylor 's formula