Re: The Apollo moon landings

On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 8:02:19 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 06:17 schrieb LaurenceClarkCrossen:

On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 0:11:55 +0000, rhertz wrote:
>

Explain the infamous conference of Neil Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins,
where they looked like dead inside. They didn't even smile once, and the
guilt and shame was all over them. Why did this happen for more than 2
hours,
>
By far, not the happiest men in the world, having conquered the Moon,
isn't it?
>
>
>
>
Apollo 11 Post Flight Press Conference (1969)
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvg5UBdiIHs

The usual "skeptic" is someone who defends the consensus of
professionals by means of an either-or dichotomy between "science" and
"pseudoscience" relying on appeal to "authority" while ridiculing
critics. It's lucky the moon landings succeeded if they tried to rely on
relativity!

>
The 'usual skeptic' would look at the 'body language' of these heros.
>
They didn't look very pleased, for instance, while being honored by
standing ovations.
>
Those were, apparently, 'orchestrated' by these guys sitting in the
middle of the audience.
>
But some sort of positive emotions would be a natural reaction to that
kind of applause.
>
But that didn't happen. Instead of smiling and grinning, the astronauts
bowed their heads down, what is not the usual sign for good feelings.

Cruel to make competent people tell lies for their whole lives.
Woof woof such dishonesty is possible only for the naturally sinful ape.

>
>
TH

--