Re: Bertietaylor 's formula

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
De : ob (at) *nospam* keoue.ru (Deangelo Kalabukhov)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.math
Suivi-à : sci.physics.relativity sci.math
Date : 05. Jul 2025, 19:34:53
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <104br8d$1ijt5$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

Bertietaylor 's formula "If A is atomic weight and N is atomic number
then the number
  of electrons E holding the N protons in the nucleus is
    E = A - N
  Now E may not be an integer. That indicates the electrons for a
  particular atom nucleus do not have unit charge on the average."
 
Atomic weight 238.05078 Atomic number 92 Number of electrons holding the
92 protons in the nucleus is E = 238.05078 - 92 = 146.05078
 
So there are 146.05078 electrons "to tighten up the 92 protons in the
nucleus."
 
But according to Bertitaylor there are 146 other protons in the nucleus.
What are holding these protons together?

we really do like your tensors, how you put it and so on

A Huge VICTORY for PUTIN┃The True Reason for the US surrendering
UKRAINE to RUSSIA Has Been REVEALED
https://www.bi%74%63%68%75te.com/v%69%64%65o/8TEOAGpTZzEq

Date Sujet#  Auteur
30 Jun01:11 * Bertietaylor 's formula20Bertitaylor
30 Jun01:20 +* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula6Bertitaylor
30 Jun01:55 i+* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula4Jim Pennino
2 Jul01:45 ii`* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula3Bertitaylor
2 Jul02:39 ii `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula2Python
2 Jul03:21 ii  `- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Bertitaylor
30 Jun02:04 i`- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Bertitaylor
30 Jun01:18 +* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula9Bertitaylor
30 Jun01:54 i+- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
30 Jun23:37 i`* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula7Bertitaylor
30 Jun23:39 i +* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula3Bertitaylor
1 Jul04:29 i i`* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula2Bertitaylor
1 Jul15:00 i i `- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
1 Jul00:50 i `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula3Jim Pennino
1 Jul10:33 i  `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula2Bertitaylor
2 Jul10:05 i   `- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Bertitaylor
30 Jun01:45 `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula4Jim Pennino
30 Jun10:57  `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula3Bertitaylor
30 Jun14:56   +- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
5 Jul19:34   `- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Deangelo Kalabukhov

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal