Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing???

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing???
De : user7160 (at) *nospam* newsgrouper.org.invalid (dart200)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logic sci.math sci.math.symbolic
Date : 02. May 2026, 00:27:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <10t3cst$1onjk$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/1/26 4:20 PM, olcott wrote:
On 5/1/2026 6:13 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/1/26 2:53 PM, olcott wrote:
On 5/1/2026 4:46 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/1/26 2:19 PM, olcott wrote:
On 5/1/2026 4:06 PM, dart200 wrote:
you seem to agree the halting problem isn't solvable,
>
>
If you would fucking pay close attention:
The halting problem is unsolvable for the same
reason that the question: What time is it (yes or no)?
is unsolvable.
>
Maybe if you would repeat that to yourself
10,000 times you would bother to notice that
I said this at least once.
>
ok. i don't necessarily disagree, the particular input is undecidable due to the form of the input itself...
>
the problem i'm have with ur proposals is:
>
_why do i care_ ???
>
>
I don't give a rat's ass why you care.
Objectively it is important because computable
truth would expose the liars and thus avoid
killing the whole planet for a few extra bucks.
>
what are they even lying about???
>
 https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/336568434_Severe_anthropogenic_climate_change_proven_entirely_with_verifiable_facts
 
climate change is a severe existential threat i agree.
i don't see how the halting problem or incompleteness relates as neither are even mentioned in the paper

>
can we further our ability in any way shape or form with this understanding???
>
>
An infallible system of truth can be created on this
basis.
>
what more truth have you proposed??? the _same_ problem remains with undecidable input...
>
 Are you fucking stupid?
 The halting problem is unsolvable for the same
reason that the question: What time is it (yes or no)?
is unsolvable.
 The halting problem is unsolvable for the same
reason that the question: What time is it (yes or no)?
is unsolvable.
 The halting problem is unsolvable for the same
reason that the question: What time is it (yes or no)?
is unsolvable.
 The halting problem is unsolvable for the same
reason that the question: What time is it (yes or no)?
is unsolvable.
 The halting problem is unsolvable for the same
reason that the question: What time is it (yes or no)?
is unsolvable.
 
ok, so the problem remains unsolvable... i'm failing to see how this is progress

 
>
>
so u seem to agree with consensus on the matter,
>
yet you're going on and on about them being wrong about why???
>
thing is: why do i care???
>
what _new abilities_ does ur supposed novel understanding actually unlock???
>
can we _do_ anything more it with it???
>
cause to me it seems ur proposing a new explanation, for the _same_ limitations,
>
and that is _not at all_ exciting to think about.
>
why would i care about a "new" explanation for the _same_ limitations???
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
 
--
arising us out of the computing dark ages,
please excuse my pseudo-pyscript,
~ the lil crank that could

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 May22:19 * Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing???7olcott
1 May22:46 `* Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing???6dart200
1 May22:53  `* Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing???5olcott
2 May00:13   `* Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing???4dart200
2 May00:20    `* Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing???3olcott
2 May00:27     `* Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing???2dart200
2 May00:36      `- Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing???1olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal