Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that the 1965 muon decay experiment WAS A HOAX.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that the 1965 muon decay experiment WAS A HOAX.
De : hertz778 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (rhertz)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Date : 03. May 2025, 23:44:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <5320ea4214c47c26ae9c77c7f47fdaaf@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Sat, 3 May 2025 22:01:55 +0000, ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog wrote:

On Sat, 3 May 2025 21:17:30 +0000, rhertz wrote:
>
You have some problems with text comprehension. Also, your
micro-temporary memory doesn't help you. That's why you live from old
memories. Aging took a toll from you.
>
I clearly wrote: "Angular momentum IS NOT CONSERVED on Earth. MAYBE, AND
LOCALLY, in
outer space and up to Mars".
>
>
FRICTION, PROK, FRICTION! (among several other factors like air drag,
quantum effects, etc.).
>
ANGULAR AND LINEAR MOMENTUM ARE CONSERVED (MAYBE) IN THE LOCAL OUTER
SPACE.
>
>
Remember: FRICTION, AMONG OTHER THINGS, PREVENT THAT MOMENTUM BE
CONSERVED ON EARTH.
>
Wrong, Richard.
>
The angular momentum of a rotating object does not disappear due
to friction, but gets dispersed even down to the molecular level.
>
If you spin up a gyroscope in an "anti-earthwise" direction, the
whole Earth slows in its rotation. Then, as the angular momentum
is dispersed due to air friction, the whole Earth eventually speeds
back up, but the speed-up of the Earth is not necessarily immediate
because the angular momentum is first dispersed in whirls and
vortices of the air.
>
If you spin the gyroscope in vacuum, the coupling between the
gyroscope's rotation and the Earth's rotation due to friction with
the bearings is more immediate.
>
Conservation of angular momentum applies to a CLOSED SYSTEM.
It is nonsense to claim that it is not conserved because individual
components of the closed system may speed up or slow down.
FRICTION = HEAT!
IT'S A SHAME THAT YOU DIDN'T CONSIDER THAT. HEAT BY CONDUCTION,
CONVECTION IN AIR AND ALSO RADIANT HEAT (YES, ELECTROMAGNETIC FORM OF
HEAT).

Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 May 25 * Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that the 1965 muon decay experiment WAS A HOAX.16Physfitfreak
3 May 25 `* Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that the 1965 muon decay experiment WAS A HOAX.15ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
3 May 25  +* Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that the 1965 muon decay experiment WAS A HOAX.9ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
3 May 25  i+- Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that the 1965 muon decay experiment WAS A HOAX.1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
3 May 25  i+* Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that the 1965 muon decay experiment WAS A HOAX.6rhertz
4 May 25  ii`* Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that the 1965 muon decay experiment WAS A HOAX.5ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
4 May 25  ii `* Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that the 1965 muon decay experiment WAS A HOAX.4rhertz
4 May 25  ii  +- Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that the 1965 muon decay experiment WAS A HOAX.1Physfitfreak
4 May 25  ii  `* Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that the 1965 muon decay experiment WAS A HOAX.2rhertz
5 May 25  ii   `- Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that the 1965 muon decay experiment WAS A HOAX.1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
4 May 25  i`- Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that the 1965 muon decay experiment WAS A HOAX.1Ross Finlayson
4 May 25  `* Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that the 1965 muon decay experiment WAS A HOAX.5Physfitfreak
4 May 25   +- Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that the 1965 muon decay experiment WAS A HOAX.1Ross Finlayson
5 May 25   `* Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that the 1965 muon decay experiment WAS A HOAX.3ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
5 May 25    +- Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that the 1965 muon decay experiment WAS A HOAX.1Ross Finlayson
5 May 25    `- Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that the 1965 muon decay experiment WAS A HOAX.1Physfitfreak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal