Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics

Liste des GroupesRevenir ร  s physics 
Sujet : Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics
De : lpo (at) *nospam* oop.gr (Demps Fotopoulos)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Suivi-à : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Date : 28. Apr 2024, 17:59:26
Autres entรชtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <v0lv9e$1ellm$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Chrome/82.0.3496.87 Mobile Safari/632.24
Volney wrote:

On 4/27/2024 5:50 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
FYI, the Maxwell-Lorentz equations as they stand do conserve
energy-momentum. If you want to be taken seriously it is up to you to
tell the world what is wrong with Maxwell-Lorentz,
and how these equations must be modified.
As long as you can't do that you are merely an incompetent tinkerer,
>
It is entirely possible that Banjo stumbled across that apparent
violation of momentum by momentum being carried away by the
electromagnetic field. But we will never know since he refuses to
produce a writeup in sufficient detail for someone to reproduce his
experiment, instead writing "Watch my videos!!!". Add his stubbornness
that he insists this is something new that violates
Newton/Einstein/Maxwell rather than a known existing behavior, you do
get the incompetent tinkerer.

not true, both wrong. Those are not "Maxwell's equations", but imported
equations he stole from somebody else, ie Faraday, kiss my ass, etc.

๐—น๐˜†๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด_๐˜„๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ_๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ.๐—”๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป_๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ_๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜_๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ธ_๐—ถ๐—ณ_๐—”๐—ง๐—”๐—–๐— ๐—ฆ_๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€_๐˜„๐—ถ๐—น๐—น_๐—ฏ๐—ฒ_๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ_๐—ผ๐—ป_๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐˜€_๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜†
https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/%76%69deo/0LmHzgkBYIll

๐—œ๐—ผ๐—œ_๐—œ๐˜'๐˜€_๐—”_๐—ง๐—ผ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น_๐——๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—š๐—ฅ๐—”๐—–๐—˜!_๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ_๐—จ.๐—ฆ._๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ_๐—”๐—น๐—น_๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด_๐—”๐—•๐—ฅ๐—”๐— ๐—ฆ_๐—ง๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ธ๐˜€_๐—ง๐—ผ_๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ_๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฅ!
https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/%76%69deo/0sHDgX4ba5KS




Date Sujet#  Auteur
28 Apr 24 * Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics2Demps Fotopoulos
3 May 24 `- Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics1bertietaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal