Re: ? ? ?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: ? ? ?
De : ttt_heg (at) *nospam* web.de (Thomas Heger)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Date : 15. Mar 2024, 09:14:30
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <l5iaguFbkcpU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
Am 10.03.2024 um 09:03 schrieb Hania Pusztai Sebestyén:
Thomas Heger wrote:
>
Am 09.03.2024 um 09:04 schrieb Bogdan Guleichik Balagul:
Thomas Heger wrote:
>
Am 08.03.2024 um 10:10 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:
GPS is pyhsically connected to the Earth, hence 'lives' in the same
'time-domain' (uses Earth time).
What is the range of Earth time, then?
>
If timer is local (opposite to 'universal'), than Earth time is valid
on Earth or nearby. In other locations even the direction of time does
not need to be the same. This means: there might be regions of the
universe,
where time runs backwards from our perspective.
>
there are no offsets in time, hence Entropy, my friend. You must be
talking about an unknown, illogic domain or manifold. You don't
undrestand mathematics that much, do you?? You stupid gearmons.
>
???
If I understand you correct (what is difficult), you try to argue, that
entropy is the reason for time per se.
Well,possibly this is true, possibly not.
I think, that time is based on a process of counting something, which
occurs always with the same frequency.
>
you don't undrestand, as said above, it's because you are uneducated and
stupid. There is no ˝𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗹𝘆_𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀_𝗶𝘀_𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗲,_𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗹𝘆_𝗻𝗼𝘁˝ in physics. Idiot. That
statement does NOT exists.
>
No, such a statement does exist, because I had written 'possibly this is true, possibly not'.
The actual fact is unknown, at least by me, hence we are allowed to speculate.
Possibly time has to do with entropy, possibly not.
If you want an answer to this riddle ('what time actually is'), you need to find it yourself.
TH

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Mar 24 * Re: ? ? ?32Maciej Wozniak
8 Mar 24 `* Re: ? ? ?31Thomas Heger
9 Mar 24  `* Re: ? ? ?30Thomas Heger
9 Mar 24   +* Re: ? ? ?13Bogdan Guleichik Balagul
10 Mar 24   i`* Re: ? ? ?12Thomas Heger
10 Mar 24   i `* Re: ? ? ?11Hania Pusztai Sebestyén
15 Mar 24   i  `* Re: ? ? ?10Thomas Heger
15 Mar 24   i   `* Re: ? ? ?9Connie Bairashevski Balashoff
17 Mar 24   i    `* Re: ? ? ?8Thomas Heger
17 Mar 24   i     `* Re: ? ? ?7Chellos Leontarakis
21 Mar 24   i      `* Re: ? ? ?6Thomas Heger
21 Mar 24   i       `* Re: ? ? ?5Péter Juhász
23 Mar 24   i        `* Re: ? ? ?4Thomas Heger
23 Mar 24   i         `* Re: ? ? ?3TReena Pooja Kishan
25 Mar 24   i          `* Re: ? ? ?2Thomas Heger
25 Mar 24   i           `- Re: ? ? ?1Smith Matoke Yamamura
10 Mar 24   `* Re: ? ? ?16Maciej Wozniak
12 Mar 24    `* Re: ? ? ?15Thomas Heger
12 Mar 24     `* Re: ? ? ?14Maciej Wozniak
14 Mar 24      `* Re: ? ? ?13Thomas Heger
14 Mar 24       +- Re: ? ? ?1Osiris Moy
17 Mar 24       `* Re: ? ? ?11Thomas Heger
17 Mar 24        `* Re: ? ? ?10Maciej Wozniak
17 Mar 24         `* Re: ? ? ?9Maciej Wozniak
18 Mar 24          `* Re: ? ? ?8Thomas Heger
18 Mar 24           +* Re: ? ? ?4Maciej Wozniak
20 Mar 24           i`* Re: ? ? ?3Thomas Heger
21 Mar 24           i +- Re: ? ? ?1Elijah Katzuba Bakiev
23 Mar 24           i `- Re: ? ? ?1Zozrov Bakinov Mikhalev
19 Mar 24           `* Re: ? ? ?3Maciej Wozniak
19 Mar 24            `* Re: ? ? ?2Maciej Wozniak
20 Mar 24             `- Re: ? ? ?1Maciej Wozniak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal