Sujet : Re: ? ? ?
De : ozoa (at) *nospam* rioiro.ru (Zozrov Bakinov Mikhalev)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.mathSuivi-à : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.mathDate : 23. Mar 2024, 21:40:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <utnb6l$2jsvc$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Outlook-Express/7.1 (Media Center; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 23.03.2024 o 08:08, Thomas Heger pisze:
Well, yes, but that is not very important (whether or not the calander
is historical correct).
It's not very important that it is incorrect, because nobody really
cares for intervals.
Let's simply assume, that the birth of Christ was the event, from where
all calenders today start.
Why not? Why to bother about any reality when we're about building some
magnificient explainations and formulas?
you misundrestand formulas. A formula is an logic macro scale explanation
in short for, As for instance, instead of reading for you 10 pages, it's
done shortly in few lines. Ie like, expect fume in your country of
residence. It's coming. It appears a lot of fume, is about to be released.
𝗠𝗼𝘀𝗰𝗼𝘄,_𝗖𝗿𝗼𝗰𝘂𝘀_𝗖𝗶𝘁𝘆_𝗛𝗮𝗹𝗹;_11_𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗱,_4_𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀_𝗰𝗮𝗽𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗱.
𝗠𝗲𝗱𝘃𝗲𝗱𝗲𝘃,_𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀_𝗺𝘂𝘀𝘁_𝗯𝗲_𝗱𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗼𝘆..
https://www.bi%74%63%68%75te.com/video/WY65JFB-oRA/
Re: ? ? ?
Re: ? ? ?