Sujet : Re: Acceleration's higher orders
De : oaa (at) *nospam* kieaw.pl (Andrea Krakowski)
Groupes : sci.math sci.physics sci.physics.relativitySuivi-à : sci.math sci.physics sci.physics.relativityDate : 24. Apr 2024, 16:11:47
Autres entΓͺtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <v0b7fj$80k5$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
J. J. Lodder wrote:
gharnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote:
William O. Davis analyzed the system which was referred to by John W.
Campbell, Jr. as "the fourth law of motion" - i.e., jerk. Davis and G.
Harry Stine got together and tested the invention. They hung it from a
wire and oriented it so the supposed thrust would be horizontal. There
was no net thrust. The "weight loss" was due to nonlinearities in the
bathroom scales because of the thumping around of the weights.
Yes, a mistake that is made over and over again.
There was some ado some time ago about some students who had put a
gyroscope on a precision 'balance'.
They noticed a change of weight that depended on the sense of rotation.
Apparently the bearings are smoother in the direction in which they are
normally run, producing less vibration to rectify, Jan
nonsense, the center of mass is moving along the axis of rotation, which is a fact. See a doctor.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensraum#/media/File:Greater_Germanic_Reich.png
π§ππ₯π§ππ₯ππ_ππ«π£ππππ‘ππ_π£π§._10_-_πͺππ¦π§π_π ππ‘ππππ ππ‘π§,_π§ππ_ππππππ_πππ_2022-04-22
https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/video/jgztuv98EroM