Sujet : Re: Perfect clocks
De : FTR (at) *nospam* nomail.afraid.org (FromTheRafters)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.mathDate : 05. May 2024, 12:52:19
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Peripheral Visions
Message-ID : <v17rtk$1r90a$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : MesNews/1.08.06.00-gb
Edkah Stavropoulos wrote :
Britain Szabó wrote:
>
Tom Roberts wrote:
On a GPS satellite, the usual definition of the second applies. But in
order for the SIGNALS from GPS satellites to be received on earth at
the correct frequencies, the time-base on the satellite must tick about
4 parts in 10^10 more slowly than a corresponding time-base on earth's
geoid (mean sea level).
monseneor, you misundrestand the entire procedure -it's not about the
signal propagation, but the difference in the gravity gradient. The
signals transmission are implied, but only after that.
>
I see people are not replying in this science newsgroup. I feel depressed.
Which newsgroup? Sometimes people don't reply to crossposted articles which also 'Follow-up to' the same crossposted groups as it looks to be a trollfest.