Re: Experiments on the validity of Relativity

Tom Roberts wrote:

On 5/13/24 1:58 AM, Luigi Fortunati wrote:

When there is an experiment that proves Einstein right, the whole world
is ready to praise him and his theories (and rightly so). However, it
is not right that, when an experiment proves Einstein wrong, no one
admits it and no one talks about it.

 
This last is just plain wrong. Any REAL experiment that refuted either
SR or GR would be GREAT NEWS and the experimenters would win praise and
accolades. But they must be real experiments within the domain of
applicability of the theory, and statistically inconsistent with its
predictions. To date no such experiments have ever been published --
your allegations here are just drivel: they are not real experiments,
and they indicate that YOU do not understand General Relativity, because
your claims are based upon a PUN on the word "acceleration".

this is incompleteness. I already proved Einstine inconsitent and a joke in science, hence physics, with my "On the Divergent Matter of the Moving Koerpers Model", where Gravity is about superpositioning the amplitude probability distribution, say Earth and another object whereever displace in space. Absolutely.

you can't expect bigger news in physics than that. The Einstine was terribly dumb in quantum mechanics, which explain he didn't undrestand the thing. The Einstine was absent at what is going on. I came to think on this illustration.

https://static-3.b%69%74%63%68%75te.com/live/cover_images/UnuX7D6YRyiE/KVAaoMRJiVVX_640x360.jpg