Re: And the mumble of your idiot guru - still inconsistent

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second As seen, the definition of second
loved so much to be invoked by relativistic morons - wasn't valid in
the time when their idiot guru lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was
ordinary 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.

 
you dont undrestand. That second is based on a oscillation which is too
long. A smaller duration oscillation proves the longer wrong. That's
why the smaller is better.

 
Maybe it is; still -  the longer one was good enough for your idiot guru
, and for the first generations of relativistic idiots as well - and
that makes their mumble inconsistent.

that's imprecise, me frendo. A lot of scientist usenet users dont know
that, ie in computers, timing is essential. Without a second you can trust,
you fuck up the entire thing, not only the wrong Einstienian relativity.
You couldnt post the crap you write, without a proper second.