Sujet : Re: Is Light Stationary?
De : shehee (at) *nospam* nnesgesw.hu (Senewa Hegedüs)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.mathSuivi-à : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.mathDate : 11. Jun 2024, 15:40:53
Autres entรชtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <v49nlk$21cem$2@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (AmigaOS 1.3; en; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 SeaMonkey/1.1.14
gharnagel wrote:
Ross Finlayson wrote:
>
On 06/10/2024 01:25 PM, gharnagel wrote:
>
Light has no mass, which is why it can exist in that frame.
Unfortunately, observers are composed of bradyons, which have mass.
Sorry, no observers allowed.
>
Light has no charge, why is it called "electromagnetic"?
Electric fields have no charge, why are they called "electric"?
lol, this usenet user dont undrestand relativity. You cant have a charge
without a field.
๐ช๐๐ง๐๐_๐จ๐ธ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป_๐ฆ๐-25_๐ด๐ฒ๐_๐ผ๐ฏ๐น๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ป_๐ฑ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ_๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ_๐๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ธ๐ฒ
A Lancet loitering munition caught the jet in the open at an airfield,
according to the Russian Defense Ministry
https://r%74.com/russia/599126-ukrainian-jet-destroyed-video/
Re: Is Light Stationary?