Re: Incorrect mathematical integration

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: Incorrect mathematical integration
De : nedla (at) *nospam* itac.pt (Clancy De santigo)
Groupes : sci.math sci.physics sci.physics.relativity
Suivi-à : sci.math sci.physics sci.physics.relativity
Date : 28. Jul 2024, 00:07:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <v83r32$1vnfm$3@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_128; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
gharnagel wrote:

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 0:54:30 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:
But let's assume that it is only a piece of rod 9 cm long that crosses
me, and that the other end has not yet passed.
At what distance will I see the other end of the rod? Let Vo = 0.8c.
 
You are going off on a tangent, not sticking to the problem you posed.
Furthermore, you haven't defined what you believe Poincaré's equations
are.  Consequently, your deflection is merely buzz words.

we agree. I believe the american people should as the trumpf, plainly, "if
you are not a Christian, what the fuck are you??". Just for young people
to undrestand. Yes, it's a requirement. Which would explain why he wants
kill people with warpspeed vaccines.

𝗜'𝗺_𝗻𝗼𝘁_𝗖𝗵𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗻_-_𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗽
https://old.b%69%74%63%68ute.com/%76%69%64eo/qJP9jPlZSAng


Date Sujet#  Auteur
28 Jul 24 o Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Clancy De santigo

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal