Re: Energy?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: Energy?
De : trttr (at) *nospam* cirrtrra.hu (Rictor Tatár)
Groupes : sci.math sci.physics sci.physics.relativity
Suivi-à : sci.math sci.physics sci.physics.relativity
Date : 05. Aug 2024, 12:08:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <v8qbs3$dv2d$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Opera Mail/12.15 (MacIntel)
gharnagel wrote:

On Sun, 4 Aug 2024 9:22:35 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
>
Stringtheory is imho nonsense.
 
"String Theory isn't complete or perfect, and may never become either.
It may eventually come to be understood as merely a step, or more likely
a collection of important steps and some missteps that were still
inevitable in our quest for a unified theory.
 
"But branding it 'nonsense' is just ignorant. Whatever it is –
almost the whole truth, a glimpse of the truth, or a beautiful non-truth
which miraculously manages to come ever so close to the truth – one
thing it cannot be is nonsense. It's a magnificent, shining edifice of
such internal cohesiveness and beauty that it almost doesn't matter if
it doesn't describe our own universe: the universe it does describe
deserves our attention and exploration.  -- Alon Amit

deplorable puerile incoherence and imbecility. Good to know how imbecility
looks like.

trump - trust the plan
https://old.b%69%74%63%68ute.com/%76%69%64eo/fW87FYKmxm58


Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 Aug 24 o Re: Energy?1Rictor Tatár

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal