Re: "Time" vs "physical time"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: "Time" vs "physical time"
De : omtb (at) *nospam* aoom.it (Baldomero Catalano)
Groupes : sci.math sci.physics sci.physics.relativity
Suivi-à : sci.math sci.physics sci.physics.relativity
Date : 09. Aug 2024, 00:08:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <v93j5l$1ahbm$3@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.8.5 (Mac OS 10.12.6)
Richard Hachel wrote:

Le 08/08/2024 à 23:25, nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) a écrit :
OK, thats clear.
So Hachelian physics has nothing to add to special relativity,
in the way of observable fact. All it adds are words, Jan
 
I like this answer for several reasons.
First because it is sincere, and you believe what you say,
and I will never prevent someone from expressing their ideas.

good you say it. Here more proofs on who is who and what and why. Enough
you read the title.

𝗜𝘀𝗿𝗮𝗲𝗹𝗶_𝗛𝗼𝘀𝗽𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹𝘀_𝗣𝗿𝗲𝗽_𝗳𝗼𝗿_𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘀_𝗖𝗮𝘀𝘂𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀
𝗣𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗻_𝗔𝘀𝗸𝘀_𝗜𝗿𝗮𝗻_𝘁𝗼_𝗦𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗲_𝗖𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘀
https://old.bi%74%63%68%75te.com/%76%69%64eo/ug8XgTmLtsS3

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Aug 24 * Re: "Time" vs "physical time"2Baldomero Catalano
9 Aug 24 `- Re: "Time" vs "physical time"1Francisco Basurto

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal