Re: DeepSeek helping me to clarify Wien-Einstein-Poincaré conspiracy.

On 4/14/25 3:33 PM, rhertz wrote:

On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 19:01:47 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:
 

rhertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:
>

Wien was already a Nobel Prize by 1905. He had a tremendous respect and
influence from the European physics community (and also abroad). Planck
didn't have this.

>
Why should we believe anything you write
when you can't even get simple facts like this right?
>
Jan

 Both AI engines corrected me with the right year, 1911. One of them
wrote that this was a typo, but it was a mistake of mine.
 Concerning you, fuck off.

Regardless, even the Chinese AI (forget cro-magnons') have been forced fed with humanities stuff disguised as physics.
Things will change though :)
You'd make a good Gospel choir member. Not so good a chorus boy. That requires a wider mind. Join your Church.