Re: Humans can't observe time. Even less, the pass of time. Science is an illusion.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: Humans can't observe time. Even less, the pass of time. Science is an illusion.
De : hitlong (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Date : 27. Apr 2025, 16:36:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <01d18d927e1bb35d7daec6502509f2e1@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 2:05:44 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:
>
On 4/24/25 10:34 PM, gharnagel wrote:
>
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 3:07:37 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:
>
On 4/23/25 7:03 PM, gharnagel wrote:
>
I've been reading an old book (1999) by Brian Green, "The Elegant
Universe" where he was preaching string theory.  I'm reading about
Calabi-Yau spaces.  Admittedly, these would be models of reality
at best, but I got to thinking: WHAT are they modeling?  And that
led me to think about zero point fields.  We usually mean virtual
electron-positron sea, but there's a sea of each and every virtual
particle pair.  And then Hertz asks the question: what is space?
Space is filled with these virtual particle pairs.  So the
question
is: which came first?
>
Sorry, didn't know you'd responded to my dick.
>
A few questions:
>
1- For what audience did Green write the book?
>
I would say, interested amateurs.
>
2- Is he British or American?
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Greene
>
3- What do you mean, saying he "was preaching" something?
>
When he wrote the book, string theory had just undergone its
third revival.
>
As you see, my dick doesn't even want to look them up, cause
he isn't sure its worth it.
>
It should have more faith.  Or not.
>
Number 2 question is for my dick to find out whether, say, if
the author wants to tell the readers someone micro-manages,
which one of the following two ways he chooses to express it:
>
American way:  "He micromanages."
>
British way:   "His ascendancy over everybody is quite curious:
the extent to which every officer and man feels the slightest
rebuke or praise, would have been before seeing him,
incomprehensible..."
>
So my dick naturally finds it prudent to know that important fact in
advance.
>
Ya lost me there.
>
Again I didn't see your followup. I think for some reason they get stuck
in Solana. Do you mess with the headers of your posts?
Nope.  The app I'm using does some thing I don't like, though.

Did he (Green) explain the stuff clearly enough for the "interested
amateurs? Like, for instance, how Sagan did.
Depends on how interested the amateur is.  When he gets into Calabi-Yao
geometry he shows enough to let one know that here there be dragons.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Apr 25 * Re: Humans can't observe time. Even less, the pass of time. Science is an illusion.17Physfitfreak
23 Apr 25 +* Re: Humans can't observe time. Even less, the pass of time. Science is an illusion.15rhertz
23 Apr 25 i`* Re: Humans can't observe time. Even less, the pass of time. Science is an illusion.14Physfitfreak
24 Apr 25 i +* Re: Humans can't observe time. Even less, the pass of time. Science is an illusion.12gharnagel
24 Apr 25 i i+* Re: Humans can't observe time. Even less, the pass of time. Science is an illusion.3rhertz
24 Apr 25 i ii+- Re: Humans can't observe time. Even less, the pass of time. Science is an illusion.1Maciej Woźniak
24 Apr 25 i ii`- Re: Humans can't observe time. Even less, the pass of time. Science is an illusion.1gharnagel
25 Apr 25 i i`* Re: Humans can't observe time. Even less, the pass of time. Science is an illusion.8Physfitfreak
25 Apr 25 i i `* Re: Humans can't observe time. Even less, the pass of time. Science is an illusion.7gharnagel
25 Apr 25 i i  +* Re: Humans can't observe time. Even less, the pass of time. Science is an illusion.2Ross Finlayson
27 Apr 25 i i  i`- Re: Humans can't observe time. Even less, the pass of time. Science is an illusion.1Ross Finlayson
27 Apr 25 i i  `* Re: Humans can't observe time. Even less, the pass of time. Science is an illusion.4Physfitfreak
27 Apr 25 i i   `* Re: Humans can't observe time. Even less, the pass of time. Science is an illusion.3gharnagel
28 Apr 25 i i    +- Re: Humans can't observe time. Even less, the pass of time. Science is an illusion.1Physfitfreak
29 Apr 25 i i    `- Re: Humans can't observe time. Even less, the pass of time. Science is an illusion.1Physfitfreak
24 Apr 25 i `- Re: Humans can't observe time. Even less, the pass of time. Science is an illusion.1Physfitfreak
27 Apr 25 `- Re: Humans can't observe time. Even less, the pass of time. Science is an illusion.1bertietaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal