Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)
De : physfitfreak (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Physfitfreak)
Groupes : sci.physics sci.physics.relativity sci.math
Date : 02. May 2025, 01:25:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Modern Human
Message-ID : <vv13di$4bde$2@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/1/25 6:54 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 5/1/25 5:31 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 5/1/25 2:06 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 5/1/25 12:13 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>
>
>
This coming Saturday's meeting between Iranians and Americans has been canceled!.. No new date has been given :)
>
Ahah!.. Reality is taking over bullshit's place.
>
>
>
>
>
Ok, I think I looked into this deeply enough. I know why they have canceled the meeting. By all probability decision has come from Americans. Why? Look at the facts. Or as I always put it, step back and look at the big picture :) Yes baby, my dick is a better physicist than any of you tribal little Bozos in these three forums!
>
Iran side in the meeting:
1- Never changes the red-lines
2- Never closes the door on negotiation
3- Constantly seeks economic gain by removal of sanctions
4- Will not get bullied
5- Will not allow lobbying for Israel
>
So Iran's side is pretty stable and predictable. It's been the exact same thing since Trump's 2018 dumping of the agreement. Now let's take a look at Americans' side:
>
USA side in the meeting:
1- Trump can't help himself bullying in the background
2- Great forces in Washington want lobbying for Israel
3- National Security Advisor Waltz and his men got sacked today
4- Waltz pressed lobbying for Israel
5- It is quite possible that Witkoff will take Waltz job
>
>
If you look at the facts above, they will tell you why Americans postponed the meeting :) As simple as that.
>
Need help?
>
American government's asses are in constant exchange back and forth with their mouths. Asses are infected with Israeli lobby, mouths are at the verge of infection by the Israelis. So in an effort for one to do its job, asses have to exchange places with mouths back and forth, constantly, and perpetually.
>
There's nothing wrong to see the mouth placed where the mouth should be. But often enough your ass is smack where the mouth should be! And your mouths taking up asshole's job.
>
Result is, Americans are now stepping back to see how they can first remedy the unique situation they're in, before they flatter themselves with speaking with Iranians. They've felt that they're not _fit_ to do that yet.
>
I think Trump wants to place Wikoff at Waltz' job to make the negotiation get a chance to lead to some form of agreement instead of war for USA for the sake of Israeli dicks.
>
If Witkoff gets that job, negotiation should continue immediately.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Ahah!.. The negotiations with Europeans also, which was planned for tomorrow, has just been postponed!.. :-)
>
Hehe :)
>
European Bitches of Americans need to get their orders from their masters first, to know what to negotiate on :)
>
What sorry asses.. They think the world isn't watching them perhaps. They must be hoping so.
>
>
   Some Arab outlets are pretending to be under the impression Iran is the side that postponed them. Their excuse is Iran in the presence of so much contradictions in USA's words (and a possible role in the explosion in Iran's port) sensed they were just wasting time.
 This is not so. As I explained, the request must've come from Americans, who by the way may have told Arab news outlets to point the finger at Iran just for the heck of it.
 In fact, it was the Ommanis who reported to Iran that the negotiations on the coming Saturday has been postponed "for reasons of logistics for the Ommanis themselves". This was Ommanis prudent and polite way of handling this. Iranians didn't know anything about it. So it must've come from the Americans, and for the reasons I went over above.
 There is some degree of _mess_ right now in USA which is funny, cause it has also been unavoidable; and not because the government here is anything more important than an entity run by baboons, but because this time around the ramifications will go beyond being just political. Far reaching economical changes are in store. China hasn't backed down, and they know what they're doing. So prices of material goods here will jump up by a factor of about 4.
 Military industrial complexes are reaping you off every day. Even dispute with India over tariffs isn't over. Who killed those 26 or so Hindus and whose money did that? They were no "Pakestanis".
 And the explosion in Iran's port?.. Somebody has been treating these old ancient people like they are their "Lebanon." Who is pest enough to do that.
 If India bans tech help to Americans, 3/4th of the American tech job positions delivered by Indians from within India suddenly gets emptied. Those employees were getting paid nothing that special and can find other jobs fast with similar pay, but Americans will have to pay 4 times higher salaries to replace the Indians with American techs here. So anything tech-related will also jump 4-fold in price if the dispute with India isn't resolved.
 Oh, you got Arabs, right? Lowering the price of oil only goes so far. It can't remedy a huge price jump across USA. Say, how far more can you raise the prices of houses here? Hehe :) Hahhahhahhahahh :-) Housing has already fucked people here in the ass so thoroughly that the tip of the billionaire's dicks have begun to show inside people's throats. Can you raise house prices four times more after that? Why don't you try it.
 So housing industry itself will lose money by a factor of 4..! Cause people cannot pay more than what they're paying right now. Then other businesses begin to suffer one by one, a chain reaction.
 In he middle of all this, Israeli rats are busy trying to subvert and impair American government's attempts to resolve the costly decades-long madness with Iran...
 You're fucked. I look at your "friends" and I learn that you're fucked.
 When your "friends" are Israelis who don't even know what friendship means outside their tribe, and when the man you chose to do the job for you confuses it with a poker game and cannot even control his mouth, what else did you morons expect? I'm not surprised by any of this.
   
I just checked the existing data. China's export to USA is only 15% of China's export to countries other than USA...
So they can kiss it goodbye for any length of time they want, and easily make up for it by exporting a tiny bit more to other countries in the world.
Trump should've placed tariffs on goods from any country _other_ than China. He did the exact opposite.
China doesn't even have to kiss it goodbye, as many Chinese stuff that comes here will continue to be purchased by the Americans who pay 4 times the price. People here need MAGA hats, no? They'll keep buying them from China at four times the price.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 Mar 25 * Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)175Physfitfreak
5 Mar 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Bertietaylor
10 Mar 25 i`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1bertitaylor
5 Mar 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
6 Mar 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Chris M. Thomasson
6 Mar 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1vallor
9 Mar 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)63Physfitfreak
11 Mar 25 i+* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)21Physfitfreak
11 Mar 25 ii+* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Jim Pennino
11 Mar 25 iii`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
11 Mar 25 ii+- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25 ii`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)17Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25 ii +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)13%
12 Mar 25 ii i+* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25 ii ii`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1%
12 Mar 25 ii i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)10Jim Pennino
12 Mar 25 ii i +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)8%
12 Mar 25 ii i i+* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
13 Mar 25 ii i ii`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5%
13 Mar 25 ii i ii `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Jim Pennino
13 Mar 25 ii i ii  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3%
13 Mar 25 ii i ii   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
13 Mar 25 ii i ii    `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25 ii i i`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Jim Pennino
13 Mar 25 ii i `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
14 Mar 25 ii `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
14 Mar 25 ii  +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1%
14 Mar 25 ii  `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25 i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)41Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25 i +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)7bertitaylor
16 Mar 25 i i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25 i i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Bertitaylor
16 Mar 25 i i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25 i i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Bertitaylor
16 Mar 25 i i    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25 i i     `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
28 Mar 25 i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)33Physfitfreak
29 Mar 25 i  +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
30 Mar 25 i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)31Physfitfreak
30 Mar 25 i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)30Physfitfreak
30 Mar 25 i    +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Chris M. Thomasson
1 Apr 25 i    i`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
1 Apr 25 i    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)27Physfitfreak
2 Apr 25 i     +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
2 Apr 25 i     `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)25Physfitfreak
2 Apr 25 i      `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)24Physfitfreak
2 Apr 25 i       `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)23Physfitfreak
2 Apr 25 i        `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)22Physfitfreak
3 Apr 25 i         `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)21Physfitfreak
4 Apr 25 i          `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)20Physfitfreak
4 Apr 25 i           `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)19Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25 i            `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)18Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25 i             `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)17Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25 i              `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)16Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25 i               `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)15Physfitfreak
10 Apr 25 i                `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)14Physfitfreak
10 Apr 25 i                 `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)13Physfitfreak
11 Apr 25 i                  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)12Physfitfreak
12 Apr 25 i                   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)11Physfitfreak
12 Apr 25 i                    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)10Physfitfreak
12 Apr 25 i                     `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)9Physfitfreak
12 Apr 25 i                      `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)8Physfitfreak
13 Apr 25 i                       `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)7Physfitfreak
13 Apr 25 i                        `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
14 Apr 25 i                         `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Physfitfreak
14 Apr 25 i                          `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Physfitfreak
14 Apr 25 i                           `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
15 Apr 25 i                            `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
16 Apr 25 i                             `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
16 Apr 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)45Physfitfreak
17 Apr 25 i+* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)9Physfitfreak
17 Apr 25 ii+- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Thomas Heger
17 Apr 25 ii`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)7Physfitfreak
17 Apr 25 ii `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
17 Apr 25 ii  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Physfitfreak
17 Apr 25 ii   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Physfitfreak
18 Apr 25 ii    +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
18 Apr 25 ii    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
18 Apr 25 ii     `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
19 Apr 25 i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)35Physfitfreak
19 Apr 25 i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)34Physfitfreak
19 Apr 25 i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)33Physfitfreak
19 Apr 25 i   +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
20 Apr 25 i   i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Physfitfreak
20 Apr 25 i   i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Physfitfreak
20 Apr 25 i   i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
20 Apr 25 i   i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
20 Apr 25 i   i    `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
21 Apr 25 i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)26Physfitfreak
21 Apr 25 i    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)25Physfitfreak
21 Apr 25 i     `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)24Physfitfreak
23 Apr 25 i      `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)23Physfitfreak
23 Apr 25 i       +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
23 Apr 25 i       `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)21Physfitfreak
24 Apr 25 i        `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)20Physfitfreak
24 Apr 25 i         +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
25 Apr 25 i         i`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
26 Apr 25 i         `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)17Thomas Heger
26 Apr 25 i          +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)15bertietaylor
2 May 25 i          i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)14Thomas Heger
4 May 25 i          i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)13Bertitaylor
27 Apr 25 i          `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
26 Apr 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
27 Apr 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Physfitfreak
30 Apr 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
1 May 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)7Physfitfreak
2 May 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
4 May 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
4 May 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)8Physfitfreak
6 May 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)18Physfitfreak
7 May 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
9 May 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
9 May 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
11 May 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
13 May 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
18 May17:38 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
19 May21:51 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
21 May02:54 `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal