Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)
De : physfitfreak (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Physfitfreak)
Groupes : sci.physics sci.physics.relativity sci.math
Date : 05. May 2025, 01:57:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Modern Human
Message-ID : <vv92e5$889v$1@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/4/25 6:14 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
  In a show of force, today, against Hegseth's nasty anti-Iranian remarks and threats, Iran unveiled her newest most advanced missile :-)
 Action in response to words! I like that :)
 But guess what, this one, cannot be stopped by your THAAD system. It'll fly through it in a manner impossible for your systems to really know where it's going, what the path is, what its target is, almost like it's not even there. Do you have anything better than THAAD, Her Hegseth?
 No, you can't defend your crews and equipment against Iran's counter attacks after you make that nice mistake.
 Range is 1200 km. Super fast. Ask Japan to help you make something better than your THAAD system now.
 I'm wondering whether Iran reverse engineered Russians' Oreshnik missiles and improved upon them, or it is the next generation type of one of Iran's existing hypersonics. Literature on it is very scarce.
 If THAAD cannot stop it then it is definitely more advanced than the Oreshnik. Even Oreshnik is the main fear of NATO, let alone this new missile unveiled today.
 Precision? It hits within _one meter_ - that's about 1 yard for you Bozos - of designated target! It is capable of finding the target despite any and all efforts available to you to conceal targets and confuse the incoming missiles.
 "Every lesson we learned in testing our missiles on Israel, we have implemented in this missile", said Iran's defense minister today.
 The minister directly named Hegseth and the threats he made the other day, and warned him what will follow if any aggression against anything Iranian is made.
 So, don't let your THAAD systems fool ya! Kiss them goodbye, if you want to hear the truth. Sell'em to Arabs :) Israelis won't buy them anymore :-))
          
Ok, some more information about the new missile has come out. No it's not based on Oreshnik, but is an upgrade of the Kheybarshekan, so I'd say soon Houthis will have them made also cause they've already building models based on Kheybarshekan for more than two years.
Could it be that it was these new missiles that gave hell to Americans bombing Houthis? That "suddenly accuracy of what they use has greatly increased" comment..? Was this fact what Hegseth was referring to when he said, "We know what you have been doing with Houthis".. Hahhahhahhahhh :-)))
Poor CIA. I guess those thieves are only there to absorb Americans tax money, and when it comes to provide intelligence, Hegseth and military has to find the needed facts right inside the battle ground by getting hit with them in their asses!..
So is he pissed more at the CIA or at Iran? .. Hahhahhahhahahh :-))
Ok, now I see at least the sense in what Hegseth said. I thought he was just being a Nazi. But he threatened to retaliate, so ... you're welcome to it! I like to see the outcome. Been waiting for it for a long, long time. Stuff need to get settled, right?
The fact that the missiles were unveiled right after Hegseth hinted at knowing their existence, also, points to Hegseth meaning these missiles cause there'd be no point for Iran to keep their existence hidden anymore.
So looks like Houthis also have them!.. None of what Houthis have hit Israel with have been very accurate, so I doubt they've used this new ones on them yet. But the way Truman ran away from Yemen so quickly sure indicates it got a good taste of them :) It could've been the force of explosion that threw the jet (or jets) in the waters.
Another piece of news in Telegram channel is that the probability of stopping these new missiles is only 2.5% for the best of air defense that Israeli and Americans can muster. So if Iran launches 200 of them, only 5 of them will get intercepted. The rest will meet their targets within one meter of them! This is a force to reckon with. I like that. It could, by itself, keep the region safe from Nazis of all sorts.
And the last bit of news I found about this is that Iran's defense minister today informed all neighboring countries of Iran emphasizing that although Iran is 100% behind them and considers them her brothers, in case of American aggression against Iran the American bases in their lands and ports will be primary targets of Iran, and will be attacked and destroyed without meaning any animosity from Iran towards those neighbors themselves. He made this fact very clear for them.
Ok, so now things are beginning to make sense. Now Trump might have a chance to continue the talk because the military option is a bit less favored. Don't forget that if the Nazis say bullshit in the news media about Iran it is to keep Israelis temporarily at bay (and deposit the handouts). It won't mean much other than that.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 Mar 25 * Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)175Physfitfreak
5 Mar 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Bertietaylor
10 Mar 25 i`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1bertitaylor
5 Mar 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
6 Mar 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Chris M. Thomasson
6 Mar 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1vallor
9 Mar 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)63Physfitfreak
11 Mar 25 i+* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)21Physfitfreak
11 Mar 25 ii+* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Jim Pennino
11 Mar 25 iii`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
11 Mar 25 ii+- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25 ii`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)17Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25 ii +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)13%
12 Mar 25 ii i+* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25 ii ii`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1%
12 Mar 25 ii i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)10Jim Pennino
12 Mar 25 ii i +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)8%
12 Mar 25 ii i i+* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
13 Mar 25 ii i ii`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5%
13 Mar 25 ii i ii `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Jim Pennino
13 Mar 25 ii i ii  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3%
13 Mar 25 ii i ii   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
13 Mar 25 ii i ii    `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25 ii i i`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Jim Pennino
13 Mar 25 ii i `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
14 Mar 25 ii `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
14 Mar 25 ii  +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1%
14 Mar 25 ii  `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25 i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)41Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25 i +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)7bertitaylor
16 Mar 25 i i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25 i i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Bertitaylor
16 Mar 25 i i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25 i i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Bertitaylor
16 Mar 25 i i    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25 i i     `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
28 Mar 25 i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)33Physfitfreak
29 Mar 25 i  +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
30 Mar 25 i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)31Physfitfreak
30 Mar 25 i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)30Physfitfreak
30 Mar 25 i    +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Chris M. Thomasson
1 Apr 25 i    i`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
1 Apr 25 i    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)27Physfitfreak
2 Apr 25 i     +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
2 Apr 25 i     `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)25Physfitfreak
2 Apr 25 i      `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)24Physfitfreak
2 Apr 25 i       `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)23Physfitfreak
2 Apr 25 i        `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)22Physfitfreak
3 Apr 25 i         `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)21Physfitfreak
4 Apr 25 i          `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)20Physfitfreak
4 Apr 25 i           `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)19Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25 i            `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)18Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25 i             `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)17Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25 i              `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)16Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25 i               `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)15Physfitfreak
10 Apr 25 i                `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)14Physfitfreak
10 Apr 25 i                 `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)13Physfitfreak
11 Apr 25 i                  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)12Physfitfreak
12 Apr 25 i                   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)11Physfitfreak
12 Apr 25 i                    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)10Physfitfreak
12 Apr 25 i                     `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)9Physfitfreak
12 Apr 25 i                      `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)8Physfitfreak
13 Apr 25 i                       `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)7Physfitfreak
13 Apr 25 i                        `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
14 Apr 25 i                         `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Physfitfreak
14 Apr 25 i                          `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Physfitfreak
14 Apr 25 i                           `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
15 Apr 25 i                            `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
16 Apr 25 i                             `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
16 Apr 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)45Physfitfreak
17 Apr 25 i+* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)9Physfitfreak
17 Apr 25 ii+- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Thomas Heger
17 Apr 25 ii`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)7Physfitfreak
17 Apr 25 ii `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
17 Apr 25 ii  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Physfitfreak
17 Apr 25 ii   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Physfitfreak
18 Apr 25 ii    +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
18 Apr 25 ii    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
18 Apr 25 ii     `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
19 Apr 25 i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)35Physfitfreak
19 Apr 25 i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)34Physfitfreak
19 Apr 25 i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)33Physfitfreak
19 Apr 25 i   +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
20 Apr 25 i   i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Physfitfreak
20 Apr 25 i   i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Physfitfreak
20 Apr 25 i   i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
20 Apr 25 i   i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
20 Apr 25 i   i    `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
21 Apr 25 i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)26Physfitfreak
21 Apr 25 i    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)25Physfitfreak
21 Apr 25 i     `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)24Physfitfreak
23 Apr 25 i      `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)23Physfitfreak
23 Apr 25 i       +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
23 Apr 25 i       `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)21Physfitfreak
24 Apr 25 i        `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)20Physfitfreak
24 Apr 25 i         +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
25 Apr 25 i         i`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
26 Apr 25 i         `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)17Thomas Heger
26 Apr 25 i          +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)15bertietaylor
2 May 25 i          i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)14Thomas Heger
4 May 25 i          i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)13Bertitaylor
27 Apr 25 i          `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
26 Apr 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
27 Apr 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Physfitfreak
30 Apr 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
1 May 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)7Physfitfreak
2 May 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
4 May 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
4 May 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)8Physfitfreak
6 May 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)18Physfitfreak
7 May 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
9 May 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
9 May 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
11 May 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
13 May 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
18 May17:38 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
19 May21:51 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
21 May02:54 `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal