Re: What is a photon

On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 11:50:31 +0000, x wrote:

On 6/1/25 03:03, bertitaylor wrote:

A photon is

>
A word thought up a while ago concerning some properties
of light called the 'photoelectric effect'.  It can have
some meaning, and like with any word or set of words, it
can have meaning that varies between people.  It is not
obvious whether the meaning that you use might even refer
to that specific theory concerning light or not.
>

a brief electromagnetic

>
Yes some properties of light have been related to electricity
and magnetism.  Those are other theories of light developed
some in the 1800s.
>

wave pulse travelling a
light speed

>
Then there are other theories about light having a constant
speed with respect to an observer or different speeds with
respect to both light emission and light observation.

Light speed is variant and that is not theory. The MMX proves it so.

>

in the medium of aether.

>
Still other theories about light jumbled together.

No mumbling or jumbling from us. Any wave needs a medium. Light is a
wave with its medium being aether.

>

Following antenna

>
?
>

theory,

>
What you have here is a bunch of sci-fi sounding
terms thrown together with no clear real meaning assigned

No, we are very clear. And totally scientific for we are following
Arindam who is second only to Sir Isaac Newton. He beats all for focus,
clarity and brevity. Denials by howling apes and wannabe killers and
sundry small people emphasize his greatness.

to them.  They sound like they may refer to something
superficially referring to an array of different theories
about light, but in reality they could have an array of
different meanings that you might assign to them later.

Blah. Unlike the Einsteinian thugs Arindam makes his new ideas very
clear. No ambiguity, no schizophrenia, in his clean and clear theory and
simple repeatable experiments.

>
For you they are a generative pejorative to nay-say,
but in reality they have been assigned no clear meaning,
they only indirectly sound like an array of different
theories of light in the past.

What rubbish. Arindam clearly states that light as photon is a brief
single electromagnetic pulse propagating as a travelling wave in aether
medium. What could be more clear. He does follow Huyghens in that wave
nature of light and also Newton for the say atomic nature of the photon.
This way Arindam reconciles the approaches of these two great
scientists. No mean job.
WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor

>

of asymmetry in the electron orbit

>
Yes there is something called 'orbitals' that
have been related to something called 'quantum
mechanics', and that has been related to something
called 'chemistry' and not just 'nuclear physics'.
>

from
external excitation causing vibration to aether.

>
Yup.  Jumping between theories tends to point again
to a generic pejorative called 'science' but in
reality terms assigned no clear meaning.
>

A change in

>
Yup.
>
No clear meaning.
>
Gibberish.
>
Yup.
>
 > ...
>
 > Woof woof woof woof
>
Yup.  Dogs are non-sentient animals.
>
Yup.

--