Re: Bertietaylor 's formula

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: Bertietaylor 's formula
De : jp (at) *nospam* python.invalid (Python)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Date : 02. Jul 2025, 02:39:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <-xCbBbwmRXFylFHWPuoCCKQnhU8@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Le 02/07/2025 à 02:45, bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) a écrit :
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 0:55:03 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
 
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 0:11:53 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
>
If A is atomic weight and N is atomic number then the number of
electrons E holding the N protons in the nucleus is
>
E = A - N
>
Now E may not be an integer. That indicates the electrons for a
particular atom nucleus do not have unit charge on the average.
>
Woof woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof nice to have one's own formula!
>
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)
>
--
>
All agree, yes?
>
--
>
Yes, everyone agrees that you are quite insane, Arindam.
 Everyone with sense and honesty agreed that Einsteinians are liars and
frauds.
No. Everyone with a brain recognize Arindam (you, sock puppet) as a demented crank.

WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Shitting and pissing on the floor won't help, Arindam.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
30 Jun01:11 * Bertietaylor 's formula29Bertitaylor
30 Jun01:20 +* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula6Bertitaylor
30 Jun01:55 i+* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula4Jim Pennino
2 Jul01:45 ii`* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula3Bertitaylor
2 Jul02:39 ii `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula2Python
2 Jul03:21 ii  `- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Bertitaylor
30 Jun02:04 i`- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Bertitaylor
30 Jun01:18 +* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula10Bertitaylor
30 Jun01:54 i+- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
30 Jun23:37 i`* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula8Bertitaylor
30 Jun23:39 i +* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula4Bertitaylor
1 Jul04:29 i i`* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula3Bertitaylor
1 Jul15:00 i i `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula2Jim Pennino
1 Jul20:07 i i  `- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Chris M. Thomasson
1 Jul00:50 i `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula3Jim Pennino
1 Jul10:33 i  `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula2Bertitaylor
2 Jul10:05 i   `- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Bertitaylor
30 Jun01:45 `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula12Jim Pennino
30 Jun10:57  `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula11Bertitaylor
30 Jun14:56   +- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
1 Jul02:38   +- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
1 Jul21:35   +- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
2 Jul00:55   +- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
2 Jul00:47   +* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula3Jim Pennino
2 Jul01:42   i`* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula2Bertitaylor
2 Jul03:11   i `- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino
2 Jul03:24   `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula3Jim Pennino
2 Jul03:36    `* Re: Bertietaylor 's formula2Bertitaylor
2 Jul04:45     `- Re: Bertietaylor 's formula1Jim Pennino

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal