Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : sci.physics sci.physics.relativity sci.math
Date : 04. Jul 2025, 23:19:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1049k24$11qlt$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/29/2025 3:16 AM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 4:21:28 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
 
On 6/28/2025 7:49 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 2:04:58 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
On 6/27/2025 5:13 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 6:56:57 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
On 6/26/2025 11:40 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 5:47:10 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
On 6/26/2025 10:37 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 6/26/2025 8:47 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:23:35 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>
Den 26.06.2025 09:15, skrev bertitaylor:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:30:27 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>
Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
>
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very
cold,
then
bang
phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
>
>
>
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
>
Where does the radiated energy come from?
>
Deuterium fission.
>
>
Deuterium is stable, does not undergo radioactive decay, and
thus
cannot
undergo fission, crackpot.
>
Fool, we are not talking about deuterium on Earth, decaying
naturally.
Things are different in the Sun's atmosphere. Lots of heat,
radiation,
charged particles, very dense there.
>
And no deuterium is decaying, but a lot of deuterium nuclei are
fused
to Helium.
>
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the
hydrogen
bombs
on Earth.
>
Good grief, what a gigantic blunder!
>
Yes it was the most gigantic blunder to think that fusion at all
happens.
>
:-D
>
It obviously is _fusion_ of H and T in a hydrogen bomb.
>
Very not obviously. The fission of the deuterium nucleus (two
protons
held by one electron) creates extraordinary force creating great
energies as produced by the stars.
>
Fusion for stars? fission to to kick artificially kick of the
reaction.
Or ICF or something.
>
[...]
>
several tanks with a metal hydride for different isotopes eof
hydrogen.
Stored...Ready for reaction.
>
Won't work, you need lotsa intense gamma rays, high energy
particles as
well to disturb the two protons in the deuterium nucleus to fission
with
snapping of the electron bond holding them together.
>
Arindam has shown how to get energy from deuterium in controlled style
in his links. Very likely so called fusion approaches these days are
based upon deuterium fission.
>
Once Einstein and Helmholtz are thrown out there is joy for future
generations.
>
Woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
>
Bertietaylor
>
--
>
Or a tank with a metal hydride in it holding say, stable hydrogen.
Apply
a little heat to it and it will release hydrogen? So, how stable would
the tank be? Can we cut into it without it exploding?
>
It should be stable if there was only hydrogen around. Anyway how is
this relevant to dark matter?
>
Not sure. Sorry about that. Humm... Perhaps dark matter can be the
underlying field scaffold?
>
What is that? Are you going to hang or behead fields!? :)
>
;^)
>
Fields are fun. Especially my experimental one. Its as if each field
line is a potential path for a photon to travel on. They can get rather
odd:
 Works when both field and photon strengths act on inverse square law.
Thus the field lines and photon splits are infinite. Photon needs aether
to exist.
A field as a continuous entity that has infinite paths, or field lines, for a photon to ride along. The gravitational field makes these up in space, due the warping of space. Call it aether, or whatever. This fabric can be warped? Field lines are actually a decent way to help "visualize" the flow of the field. Then we can get into volumetrics. A photons path can be bent around things along its journey through space. If you take it as a fluid, then think of an eddy in a river. spiraling around. Or the way smoke acts in a room. It can create its own spirals, and dynamics. Just shooting the breeze here, try not to flame to to bad. :^)
aether, fluid, I don't know. It sure seems to be an infinite continuous entity. The space itself, and how its warped and dynamic.
Anyway, sorry.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Jun 25 * Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)34Jim Pennino
26 Jun 25 `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)33bertitaylor
26 Jun 25  +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
26 Jun 25  `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)31Paul.B.Andersen
27 Jun 25   +* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)29Bertitaylor
27 Jun 25   i+* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)16Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jun 25   ii+- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jun 25   ii`* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)14Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jun 25   ii `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)13Bertitaylor
27 Jun 25   ii  +* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)7Chris M. Thomasson
28 Jun 25   ii  i`* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)6Bertitaylor
29 Jun03:04   ii  i `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)5Chris M. Thomasson
29 Jun03:49   ii  i  `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)4Bertitaylor
29 Jun05:21   ii  i   `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)3Chris M. Thomasson
29 Jun11:16   ii  i    `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)2Bertitaylor
4 Jul23:19   ii  i     `- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jun 25   ii  +* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)2Bertitaylor
27 Jun 25   ii  i`- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
27 Jun 25   ii  `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)3Jim Pennino
28 Jun 25   ii   `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)2Bertitaylor
28 Jun 25   ii    `- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
27 Jun 25   i+- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
29 Jun15:31   i+* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)5Jim Pennino
29 Jun21:10   ii`* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)4William Hyde
29 Jun21:23   ii +* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)2Stefan Ram
29 Jun23:53   ii i`- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1William Hyde
29 Jun23:02   ii `- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
29 Jun23:58   i+- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
30 Jun00:10   i+- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Bertitaylor
1 Jul02:23   i+- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
1 Jul02:31   i`* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)3Jim Pennino
1 Jul03:27   i `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)2Bertitaylor
1 Jul04:39   i  `- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
3 Jul15:06   `- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Bertitaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal