Re: ? ? ?

Jim Pennino wrote:

 
In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

Jim Pennino wrote:

>
In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

the fact is...there is no devise on earth that can detect ...time.

>
That depends on which definition of the word time you are using.
>
a : the measured or measurable period during which an action, process,
or condition exists or continues
>
b : a nonspatial continuum that is measured in terms of events which
succeed one another from past through present to future
>
< snip old crap >

>
>
The operative word is "detect" not time.
>
>
>
>
de·tect
/d?'tek(t)/
verb
discover or identify the presence or existence of.
to discover the true character of
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+detect
>
>
identify the presence of time.
>
>
identify the existence of time.
>
>
The fact is...there is no devise on earth that can detect, identify, the presence and existence of  ...time.

 
The fact is what you post is childish, ignorant twaddle.

 
 
I was using 3rd grade reading levels so that anyone can understand...but