Re: Acceleration's higher orders

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: Acceleration's higher orders
De : gngn (at) *nospam* rnl.gt (Bonny χρήται Μαιανδρίου)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Suivi-à : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Date : 11. Mar 2024, 21:42:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <usnmq8$38hto$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Evolution/2.32.3 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0)
Ross Finlayson wrote:

So, the infinitely-many higher-orders of acceleration,
basically follows directly for the infinitely-many divisions of _time_,
all together, altogether, that "the physics", is a theory of sum
potentials, a theory of omega potentials, and altogether:  real.

I'm not sure how to help. Maybe this:

 𝗚𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘆_𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱_𝘂𝘀𝗲_𝗨𝗞_𝘁𝗼_𝗴𝗲𝘁_𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗹𝗲𝘀_𝘁𝗼_𝗞𝗶𝗲𝘃_–_𝗙𝗠
British Foreign Secretary David Cameron has offered to help Berlin avoid
“problems preventing a Taurus delivery” to Ukraine
https://r%74.com/news/594097-germany-missile-swap-uk-kiev/

What else are limeys busy doing for a living, except offering all the help
you need to pin their crimes on you.

I heard that the Americans have lost another Abrams tank today. That's
four down 27 to go.

Just don't transport those missiles on British madeTanks.

Russians should make it very clear that this "scheme" is the same as
Germany supplying the missiles directly and that if used against Russia,
Germany will be held accountable along with England as a co conspirator.

The Russians might see through this, Anna, and their missiles for Germany
won't be routed through another country, they'll go direct.

The idiots think Russia will only target Germany, and that's what they
actually want to happen. The UK and US, wants Germany destroyed, and they
want to bait Russia to do it.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Mar 24 * Re: Acceleration's higher orders17Volney
9 Mar 24 `* Re: Acceleration's higher orders16hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
9 Mar 24  +- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Ross Finlayson
9 Mar 24  +* Re: Acceleration's higher orders12Ramiro Juárez
10 Mar 24  i`* Re: Acceleration's higher orders11Ross Finlayson
10 Mar 24  i `* Re: Acceleration's higher orders10Ismael Balazowsky Homutov
11 Mar 24  i  +- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Bonny χρήται Μαιανδρίου
11 Mar 24  i  +- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Lou Bodnár Sárközi
20 Mar 24  i  `* Re: Acceleration's higher orders7Ross Finlayson
21 Mar 24  i   +- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Olden Ibuka Yokokawa
7 Apr 24  i   +* Re: Acceleration's higher orders3Ross Finlayson
24 Apr 24  i   i`* Re: Acceleration's higher orders2bertietaylor
24 Apr 24  i   i `- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1bertietaylor
23 Apr 24  i   +- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Ross Finlayson
31 May 24  i   `- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Ross Finlayson
23 Apr 24  `* Re: Acceleration's higher orders2J. J. Lodder
24 Apr 24   `- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Andrea Krakowski

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal