Sujet : Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics
De : lpo (at) *nospam* oop.gr (Demps Fotopoulos)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.mathSuivi-à : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.mathDate : 28. Apr 2024, 17:59:26
Autres entรชtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <v0lv9e$1ellm$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Chrome/82.0.3496.87 Mobile Safari/632.24
Volney wrote:
On 4/27/2024 5:50 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
FYI, the Maxwell-Lorentz equations as they stand do conserve
energy-momentum. If you want to be taken seriously it is up to you to
tell the world what is wrong with Maxwell-Lorentz,
and how these equations must be modified.
As long as you can't do that you are merely an incompetent tinkerer,
>
It is entirely possible that Banjo stumbled across that apparent
violation of momentum by momentum being carried away by the
electromagnetic field. But we will never know since he refuses to
produce a writeup in sufficient detail for someone to reproduce his
experiment, instead writing "Watch my videos!!!". Add his stubbornness
that he insists this is something new that violates
Newton/Einstein/Maxwell rather than a known existing behavior, you do
get the incompetent tinkerer.
not true, both wrong. Those are not "Maxwell's equations", but imported
equations he stole from somebody else, ie Faraday, kiss my ass, etc.
๐น๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด_๐๐ต๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ_๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฐ.๐๐๐๐๐ถ๐ป_๐ฎ๐๐ธ๐ฒ๐ฑ_๐ฝ๐ผ๐ถ๐ป๐_๐ฏ๐น๐ฎ๐ป๐ธ_๐ถ๐ณ_๐๐ง๐๐๐ ๐ฆ_๐บ๐ถ๐๐๐ถ๐น๐ฒ๐_๐๐ถ๐น๐น_๐ฏ๐ฒ_๐๐๐ฒ๐ฑ_๐ผ๐ป_๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ถ๐ฎ๐_๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐
https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/%76%69deo/0LmHzgkBYIll๐๐ผ๐_๐๐'๐_๐_๐ง๐ผ๐๐ฎ๐น_๐๐๐ฆ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐!_๐ง๐ต๐ฒ_๐จ.๐ฆ._๐๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ_๐๐น๐น_๐ฅ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐ถ๐ป๐ด_๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ ๐ฆ_๐ง๐ฎ๐ป๐ธ๐_๐ง๐ผ_๐ง๐ต๐ฒ_๐ฅ๐๐๐ฅ!
https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/%76%69deo/0sHDgX4ba5KS