Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics

Demps Fotopoulos wrote:

Volney wrote:

On 4/27/2024 5:50 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:

FYI, the Maxwell-Lorentz equations as they stand do conserve
energy-momentum. If you want to be taken seriously it is up to you to
tell the world what is wrong with Maxwell-Lorentz,
and how these equations must be modified.
As long as you can't do that you are merely an incompetent tinkerer,

>
It is entirely possible that Banjo stumbled across that apparent
violation of momentum by momentum being carried away by the
electromagnetic field. But we will never know since he refuses to
produce a writeup in sufficient detail for someone to reproduce his
experiment, instead writing "Watch my videos!!!". Add his stubbornness
that he insists this is something new that violates
Newton/Einstein/Maxwell rather than a known existing behavior, you do
get the incompetent tinkerer.

not true, both wrong. Those are not "Maxwell's equations", but imported equations he stole from somebody else, ie Faraday, kiss my ass, etc.

The struggle then was with Ampere's equations for the electromagnetic force
which involved the two currents in the forward and backward path and the
now familiar F=Bil where only one current and the resultant magnetic fields
nomal to it impact upon the current conductor of length l. This is now
exclusively used in motor design. bt

>

𝗹𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝘄𝗵𝗼𝗿𝗲_𝗦𝗲𝗰.𝗔𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻_𝗮𝘀𝗸𝗲𝗱_𝗽𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁_𝗯𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗸_𝗶𝗳_𝗔𝗧𝗔𝗖𝗠𝗦_𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗹𝗲𝘀_𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹_𝗯𝗲_𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗱_𝗼𝗻_𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮𝘀_𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆

https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/%76%69deo/0LmHzgkBYIll

>

𝗜𝗼𝗜_𝗜𝘁'𝘀_𝗔_𝗧𝗼𝘁𝗮𝗹_𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗖𝗘!_𝗧𝗵𝗲_𝗨.𝗦._𝗘𝘃𝗮𝗰𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱_𝗔𝗹𝗹_𝗥𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝗔𝗕𝗥𝗔𝗠𝗦_𝗧𝗮𝗻𝗸𝘀_𝗧𝗼_𝗧𝗵𝗲_𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗥!

https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/%76%69deo/0sHDgX4ba5KS