Re: Langevin's paradox again

gharnagel wrote:

Richard Hachel wrote:

and which is much more logical than what we find in the textbooks. R.H.

 
But particle experiments are in textbooks, too.  Sure, I haven't seen
the particle accelerator result employed in the twin paradox explanation
(but maybe I just haven't seen it).  Perhaps that's because there are
several other explanations that are correct and follow the path
prescribed in the problem.

i like your thinking. In america they shit in a hole back in their garden,
calling it "𝙖_𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙮". What "a property" is that, paying to bidon a 20% of
it every year??

𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀_𝗢𝗯𝘃𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀_𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗱𝗲_𝗜𝘀_𝗡𝗼𝘁_𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁_𝗜𝘁_𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗸𝘀_𝗟𝗶𝗸𝗲
https://old.b%69%74%63%68%75te.com/%76%69%64eo/XCdFOeE1dQhl

𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗲𝗿_𝗜𝘀𝗿𝗮𝗲𝗹𝗶_𝗣𝗠_𝗔𝗱𝗺𝗶𝘁𝘀_𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮_𝘀𝘂𝗰𝗸_𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗸𝘀
https://old.b%69%74%63%68%75te.com/%76%69%64eo/PSWzdvIjsHX8