Sujet : Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.mathDate : 04. Apr 2025, 20:39:01
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <IiqdnXWB2r3IqG36nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 04/04/2025 12:34 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 4/4/25 12:03 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
Stephen Hawking once asked:
>
Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
>
If Stephen Hawking would like an answer
to that question, has he ever consider
asking a woman that question?
>
I don't mean a woman scientist..
>
i mean, just any woman.
>
Where did Stephen Hawking get the idea he is
entitled to know the answer?
>
>
Is he Moses?
>
>
>
If you're keen to get that answer, the answer is, "Physfit's dick is the
culprit, pushing all this forward." Ask Moses.
>
>
Shouldn't you be referring to Kosmanson or he to you?
Being the authority in these matters.
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?