Sujet : Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.mathDate : 04. Apr 2025, 21:02:42
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <T06dnfy_nONyp236nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 04/04/2025 12:45 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 4/4/25 2:39 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 04/04/2025 12:34 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 4/4/25 12:03 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
Stephen Hawking once asked:
>
Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
>
If Stephen Hawking would like an answer
to that question, has he ever consider
asking a woman that question?
>
I don't mean a woman scientist..
>
i mean, just any woman.
>
Where did Stephen Hawking get the idea he is
entitled to know the answer?
>
>
Is he Moses?
>
>
>
If you're keen to get that answer, the answer is, "Physfit's dick is the
culprit, pushing all this forward." Ask Moses.
>
>
>
Shouldn't you be referring to Kosmanson or he to you?
>
Being the authority in these matters.
>
>
>
>
I know you miss Kosmanson's journals. I'll quote his latest one later
today :)
>
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMF_-HprkZs&list=PLb7rLSBiE7F4eHy5vT61UYFR7_BIhwcOY&index=10"Moment and Motion: monism and theory, doubling-waves"
I don't ads on my youtube channel so any ads interrupting
the gentle remonstrance are unwanted freeloaders.