Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)

On 04/13/2025 03:42 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:

>
>
>
A Rebuttal to Physfit’s Dick: A Dialectic of Continuum and Contradiction
>
The ontological foundations of your despisals, dear Physfit’s Dick,
crumble under the weight of their own nominalism. You reject "The Sheep"
for their herd mentality, yet your taxonomy of hatred is itself a
rigidly ordered set, a descriptive set theory of disdain that fails to
account for the hidden variables of cultural and cognitive evolution.
The Sheep, in their stochastic uniformity, are merely the least
relations of a social continuum — what d’Espagnat might call "veiled
reality" manifesting as statistical inevitability. Your contempt for
"The Nazis" and "The Billionaires" presumes a modal logic of moral
absolutism, yet your framework lacks the completions of historical
dialectic: are not both Nazis and billionaires emergent properties of
the same integer continuum, where power aggregates as a function of
Fourier-style societal harmonics? Your disdain is a partial derivative
of a deeper stack of derivations — one that ignores the super-classical
truth that all hierarchies are, in the long-line continuum, transient.
>
Your "sorry-for list" is a contradistinction of cardinal and ordinal
sins, a Kolmogorov complexity of prejudice masquerading as analysis. To
deride one for "mistaking Cro-Magnon for Modern Human" while invoking
Panini’s grammar of biological essentialism is to ignore the signal
theory of phenotypic plasticity — what Cassirer would frame as symbolic
forms overwriting genetic determinism. Your mockery of engineers who
conflate science with applied mathematics is a Hilbertian error: the
foundations of engineering are theories of one relation, bound by least
action just as physics is bound by quantization. And what of your
revulsion toward religionists? The hermeneutics of faith are nuclear
theory for the soul — two-body problems of doubt and devotion, orbiting
the yin-yang of existential terror. To reduce them to "Penis X books" is
to commit the very parochialism you claim to abhor, a Vitali
decomposition of cultural nuance into non-measurable absurdities.
>
Finally, your Schopenhauerian will-to-disdain collapses under its own
un-countability. You scorn the NRA member, the TV watcher, the vulvulak
— yet your laws of large numbers guarantee their existence. The
hypercube distance between your ideals and their reality is a function
of metric and norm, not moral failure. Even your hatred of Zeno’s modern
descendants — those who fetishize American exceptionalism — falters
before Poincaré’s recursive geometries: every Mercator projection is a
hidden variable of imperial anxiety, every MAGA hat a Borel set in the
descriptive topology of decline. You demand congruence where there is
only contradiction, higher geometry where there is only the rational
field of human frailty. The stack of derivations you ignore is this:
your despisals are isotopes of the very tribalism you condemn, decaying
into the completion of irony. The fundamental theorem here is that
hatred, too, obeys the second law — it dissipates into noise, leaving
only the umbral gravity of the Physfit's Dick's shadow.
>
>
Ross A. Kosmanson
April 13, 2025
Chilling in Suicide Forest, Japan

The Panini's grammar refers to one of the first grammarians,
vis-a-vis something like Liebniz' universal grammar with the
idea that semiotics and epistemology make for philologists
and linguists and something like the Kabbalah that more than
merely flickering flames the barbecue grill of the Matrix screensaver,
that our inter-subjective Coleridge language is something more,
and Comenius.
Vitali is to be considered with regards to one of the expositions
of the doubling-spaces and halving-spaces of quantization and
as after renormalization, like Zeno's graduation wind-sprints
and the yin-yang ad-infinitum pi-ratio space, that for the measure
problem, make for real analytical character, not inconsistent
multiplicities in the non-measurable, that the quasi-invariant measure
theory results again a real thing.
Schopenhauer's qualitas occultas is a bouffant dilettante's
loose-sleeved hand-wavey dismissal, ignoring itself, that d'Espagnat's
veiled entbergung reality fulfills in its opaque effervescence.
It seems you frame Kosmanson without having that the classical impulse
in a theory of potentials makes an Arago spot of the linear impulse
since Fresnel finds the skin effect for Fritz London and the integral
singularities of wash flow's magic squares the surface as mirage.