Sujet : Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.1
De : kvvvk (at) *nospam* keaim.gr (Delman Vamvakidis)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.mathSuivi-à : sci.physics.relativity sci.mathDate : 25. May 2025, 15:34:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <100v9pq$1di4f$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2
Maciej Woźniak wrote:
On 5/25/2025 1:08 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 24.05.2025 17:21, skrev Julio Di Egidio:
which, apparently. That said, thanks for asking:
>
The "clock hypothesis", in simple terms, is the principle that all
working clocks tick at the same rate (the proper time rate) in their
own frame.
Anyone can check GPs, in the real world the rate of Cs clocks is either
9 192 631 770 or 9 192 631 774. Not even talking about pendulum clocks.
Good bye, "clock hypothesis",
good bye The Shit of Einstein.
my friend, pendulum clocks are NOT clocks, but altitude_meters. Please be
careful what you wish. Higher altitude gives less beeps.
[ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.1
Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.1
