Sujet : Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.1
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Woźniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.mathDate : 25. May 2025, 15:52:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <1842ccbeef873d30$20502$1799812$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/25/2025 4:34 PM, Delman Vamvakidis wrote:
Maciej Woźniak wrote:
On 5/25/2025 1:08 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 24.05.2025 17:21, skrev Julio Di Egidio:
which, apparently. That said, thanks for asking:
>
The "clock hypothesis", in simple terms, is the principle that all
working clocks tick at the same rate (the proper time rate) in their
own frame.
>
Anyone can check GPs, in the real world the rate of Cs clocks is either
9 192 631 770 or 9 192 631 774. Not even talking about pendulum clocks.
Good bye, "clock hypothesis",
good bye The Shit of Einstein.
my friend, pendulum clocks are NOT clocks, but altitude_meters.
I'm not your friend and pendulum clocks
are clocks.
[ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.1
Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.1
