Re: What is a photon

Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 15:21 schrieb Ladd Hudoleev:

Thomas Heger wrote:
 

Am Donnerstag000012, 12.06.2025 um 15:33 schrieb Afif Lew:

Thomas Heger wrote:

Am Donnerstag000012, 12.06.2025 um 00:19 schrieb Laurence Vassilikos:

Thomas Heger wrote:

I call this scheme 'subjectivism', which means: if all observers are
of equal rights, than all possible observers need to observe a
different world. And all observers observe necessarily from their
own position.

no, that's called 'objectivism'

No, because I had called that schema 'subjectivism'.

>
you cant call shit as you want; that's already defined by consent.

>
I used the word 'subjectivism' for the rule, that all observers see the
world 'subjective' (meaning: with their own eyes only).

 you never know nor prove that; you are making shit as you go.

That's actually quite rude.
But, anyhow: you can only see with your own eyes!
That's why I thought, that 'subjectivism' would be a good thing, because it matches the way we see the world.
This would include the concept of relativity and local time.
But not only this, this would also allow matter itself to be 'relative'.
This in turn would allow a astonishingly simple connection between relativity and QM.
About this idea I have written kind of 'book':
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
Its benefit is mainly, that this 'triality universe' requires only very few basic assumptions.
The disadvantage is mainly, that the concept is quite counter-intuitive.
Especially the role of matter is different to standard concepts, as it is not based on lasting  particles.
TH