Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven
De : noota (at) *nospam* avnvvba.ru (Jonatan Babanov)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.math
Suivi-à : sci.physics.relativity sci.math
Date : 20. Jun 2025, 10:42:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1033aef$ls0u$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Evolution/2.32.3 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0)
Mikko wrote:

On 2025-06-19 18:01:55 +0000, Richard Hachel said:
Everyone knows this is false, and that E=mc².sqrt(1+Vr²/c²).
So, no. Mass is an invariant.
It's strange, moreover, that idiotic scientists still write:
m'=m/sqrt(1-v²/c²).
 
There is nothing wrong in writing so. The symbol m' just denotes
something else than mass: it is the energy expressed in units of mass.

wow, then that's already circular, as THAT mass is already light speed
defined. That's already in it, and you are moving in circles. Thank you
making it obvious.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Jun 25 * The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven16LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25 +* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven9J. J. Lodder
15 Jun 25 i+- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25 i+- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25 i+- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25 i+* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven4LaurenceClarkCrossen
16 Jun 25 ii`* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven3Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jun 25 ii `* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven2LaurenceClarkCrossen
18 Jun 25 ii  `- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1Paul.B.Andersen
17 Jun 25 i`- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Jun 25 +* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven3Mikko
27 Jun 25 i`* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven2LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Jul10:44 i `- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1Mikko
19 Jun 25 `* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven3Richard Hachel
20 Jun 25  `* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven2Mikko
20 Jun 25   `- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1Jonatan Babanov

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal