Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 6/16/2025 3:53 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:Dreams that are utterly bereft of any supporting reasoning at all DO NOT COUNT AS REBUTTALS.Op 15.jun.2025 om 22:10 schreef olcott:Baseless dogmatic statements that are utterly bereft of anyvoid DDD()>
{
HHH(DDD);
return;
}
>
When I challenge anyone to show the details of exactly
how DDD correctly simulated by ANY simulating termination
analyzer HHH can possibly reach its own simulated "return"
statement final halt state they ignore this challenge.
It seems very difficult for you to read.
We clearly stated that the challenge is improper.
HHH is incorrect
supporting reasoning at all DO NOT COUNT AS REBUTTALS.
Wrong. It has been proven, but you close your eyes and pretend that the proofs do not exit. Very childish.and there is no way to make a correct HHH for all inputs.Counter-factual, Not one person ever proved this.
>>>
THAT FACT THAT NOT ONE PERSON HAS MET THIS CHALLENGE
IN SEVERAL YEARS IS VERY STRONG EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT.
It has been proven that no correct HHH exists,
Many words, but no reasoning in your text. It seems you cannot come up with a better counterargument.so it makes no sense to challenge anybody to make a correct HHH. The challenge itself shows a lack of understanding of the matter.In other words you don't have any rebuttal all you
>
have is dogmatic statements utterly bereft of any
supporting reasoning.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.