Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT

Op 16.jun.2025 om 02:57 schreef olcott:

On 6/15/2025 6:44 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/15/25 4:10 PM, olcott wrote:

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}
>
When I challenge anyone to show the details of exactly
how DDD correctly simulated by ANY simulating termination
analyzer HHH can possibly reach its own simulated "return"
statement final halt state they ignore this challenge.

>
And it seems you don't understand that the problem is that while, yes, if HHH does infact do a correct simulation, it will not reach a final state, that fact only applie *IF* HHH does that, and all the other HHHs which differ see different inputs.
>

 *I should have said*
When one or more instructions of DDD are correctly
simulated by ANY simulating termination analyzer HHH
then DDD never reaches its simulated "return" statement
final halt state.
 

Why repeating this failure of HHH to reach the end of the simulation of a halting program?
We have seen that many times and it is not very interesting.