Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT

On 6/16/2025 3:53 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 15.jun.2025 om 22:10 schreef olcott:

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}
>
When I challenge anyone to show the details of exactly
how DDD correctly simulated by ANY simulating termination
analyzer HHH can possibly reach its own simulated "return"
statement final halt state they ignore this challenge.

 It seems very difficult for you to read.
We clearly stated that the challenge is improper.
HHH is incorrect

Baseless dogmatic statements that are utterly bereft of any
supporting reasoning at all DO NOT COUNT AS REBUTTALS.

and there is no way to make a correct HHH for all inputs.
 

>
THAT FACT THAT NOT ONE PERSON HAS MET THIS CHALLENGE
IN SEVERAL YEARS IS VERY STRONG EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT.

 It has been proven that no correct HHH exists,

Counter-factual, Not one person ever proved this.

so it makes no sense to challenge anybody to make a correct HHH. The challenge itself shows a lack of understanding of the matter.
 

In other words you don't have any rebuttal all you
have is dogmatic statements utterly bereft of any
supporting reasoning.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer