Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 6/17/2025 4:31 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:Yes, you close your eyes for the errors presented to you and pretend that they do not exist.Op 16.jun.2025 om 18:58 schreef olcott:I ignore most of your messages.On 6/16/2025 3:53 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:>Op 15.jun.2025 om 22:10 schreef olcott:>void DDD()>
{
HHH(DDD);
return;
}
>
When I challenge anyone to show the details of exactly
how DDD correctly simulated by ANY simulating termination
analyzer HHH can possibly reach its own simulated "return"
statement final halt state they ignore this challenge.
It seems very difficult for you to read.
We clearly stated that the challenge is improper.
HHH is incorrect
Baseless dogmatic statements that are utterly bereft of any
supporting reasoning at all DO NOT COUNT AS REBUTTALS.
Dreams that are utterly bereft of any supporting reasoning at all DO NOT COUNT AS REBUTTALS.
>>>and there is no way to make a correct HHH for all inputs.>
>>>
THAT FACT THAT NOT ONE PERSON HAS MET THIS CHALLENGE
IN SEVERAL YEARS IS VERY STRONG EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT.
It has been proven that no correct HHH exists,
Counter-factual, Not one person ever proved this.
Wrong. It has been proven, but you close your eyes and pretend that the proofs do not exit. Very childish.
>
It is categorically impossible to show how DDD correctlyIndeed. No HHH exists that can do a correct simulation if DDD calling HHH itself.
simulated by simulating termination analyzer HHH can
possibly reach its own simulated "return" statement final
halt state.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.