Sujet : Re: ? ? ?
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Wozniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.mathDate : 10. Mar 2024, 11:35:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <17bb60d6786e33d8$193$165553$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
W dniu 09.03.2024 o 08:20, Thomas Heger pisze:
Am 08.03.2024 um 10:10 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:
W dniu 08.03.2024 o 09:12, Thomas Heger pisze:
Am 07.03.2024 um 15:41 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:
W dniu 07.03.2024 o 07:57, Thomas Heger pisze:
>
The flow of time is assumed to be constant,
>
Assumed by whom?
It usually is, but exceptions happen.
>
I personally support the idea of local time, which is always flowing
forward in the local environment, but which is not universal.
>
You may support it, it's still stupid.
>
>
I needed this assumption (which stems imho from Poincaré) for my
'book':
>
And GPS staff needed the opposite assumption
for their system to work. What do you find
more important - your "book" or working
GPS?
>
No, because the GPS does not violate my assumptions.
>
Yes, it does. You may pretend it doesn't - it doesn't
impress me the slightest.
>
>
>
GPS is pyhsically connected to the Earth, hence 'lives' in the same
'time-domain' (uses Earth time).
>
What is the range of Earth time, then?
If timer is local (opposite to 'universal'), than Earth time is valid on Earth or nearby.
So - for every observation made from Earth or nearby?
What kind of object does use time?
I regard matter as 'timelike stable patterns'.
I don't give a damn to it. So, what kind of objects
does use time? Does a rock do? What for?