Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:Heh-heh.
That is not the case, so this is a new discovery - the Lorentz force doesCorrect, merely experimental.
NOT have an equal and opposite reaction. Your point is merely theoretical.
My evidence is experimental.
It stands falsified by a reliable theory.A theory is a conjecture that is widely shared. It is falsified by experimental evidence.
FYI, the Maxwell-Lorentz equations as they standNo, they do not. Force = Magnetic field times current times length of conductor in a nice vector relationship, with only one current as variable, is intrinsically without reaction. It is most widely used by all electrical and electronics engineers. It is the basis for modern electric motor design.
do conserve energy-momentum.
If you want to be taken seriously it is up to you to tell the world what is wrong with Maxwell-Lorentz,Nothing wrong with them. They are perfectly correct. My only grouse is why the name of Lorentz should be there, it should be replaced by Heaviside, for the vector notation he introduced. And the Lorentz force must be renamed as Thomson-Heaviside Force, or abbreviated as THE force. Out with Lorentz!
and how these equations must be modified.
As long as you can't do that you are merely an incompetent tinkerer,Hardly. The Arindam-Newton Laws of Motion will take humanity to the stars, after expanding all over the solar system.
Jan
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.