Re: DeepSeek helping me to clarify

On 04/14/2025 08:09 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:

On 4/14/25 9:26 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 04/14/2025 06:51 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:

On 4/14/25 5:32 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

J. J. Lodder wrote:

>
The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>

>
Where do you think The Constitution of the United States comes
from???
>
The Roman Empire! am i wrong here?

>
Yes, you are, and off-topic too,
>
Jan

>
>
The Founding Fathers drew inspiration from the Roman Republic,
especially its emphasis on checks and balances, but adapted the model
to create a unique system of government.
>
>

>
>
U.S. Constitution is dated. Americans now get their "inspiration" from
Satan, not the Roman Republic.
>

>
Speak for yourself.
>
Pretty much whenever I see frothy post-bait like "the end of
the world is nigh" or "get used to it", either, it's like,
I don't believe either of you two and furthermore I think
it's mostly the result of a straw-man froth-farm meant to
desensitive like a meat tenderizer, and that it most certainly
does _not_ represent common sense and usual opinion.
>
I was talking to this guy the other day, we met and were
talking and he says "I'm 96 years old" and we were having
a genial conversation and talking about what a wonderful
world it was and better than alright then a bit about
the politics and he says "stupid bastards" then back
about seeing the world and having a nice day.
>
The Founding Fathers of America after Locke and Montesqieu
and Montaigne arrived at a bill of universal individual
rights, if though the universal bit took a while to get
fulfilled, vis-a-vis being Senators and Governors and such.
>
So, that's a _great_ and important and critical aspect,
and with what resulted the middle class, and a strong
and educated middle class which these days is sort of
fat and media-addicted, the Bill of Rights is a particularly
American invention and is widely modeled around the world
as what results human rights and these sorts things.
>
>
The Roman Republic was a particularly innovative form
of government itself, as after something like Polybius'
history of it, and for Strabo or for Marcus Aurelius,
then though that these days we've already done better.
>
>
>
Then as with regards to mechanical inference it's sort
of a thing as "well you can get born and have to keep
all your bodily functions functioning and get parented
until you reach the age of majority which is about 18 years,
during which time your spawners are responsible for any
your actions".
>
>
Human years, ....
>
>
>
So, anyways, you can talk about radicals of either ilk,
but usual nonagenarians think they're s.b.'s.
>
Such radicals are not natural friends of a prosperous middle class.
>
>

>
>
Hmm.. Good old days you might think. Not anymore! You people aren't the
Americans who developed such thoughts.
>
And even they, the "founding fathers".. they sucked bad. As the dead
American Natives. The live ones too, you know, the ones that one day
will devour you.
>
Problem is your species. It is your species that's outdated.
>
>

Actually much of the Americas North and South is mestizo,
and lots of Indians-with-a-feather integrated, though it's
agreeable that the various cultures of the post-Deluvian
saw very different arrivals at organizations of peoples.
Of course the kool-aid is very palatable, or as with regards
to that ideally the egalitarian ideals beat other systems of
government, with regards to free-thinking and independent peoples,
what the majority would be.
So, you're welcome to that foul kool-aid, here we have good stuff.
Or, the right stuff, as it were.