Re: Acceleration's higher orders

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Acceleration's higher orders
De : kkwya (at) *nospam* szyem.ru (Ismael Balazowsky Homutov)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Suivi-à : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Date : 10. Mar 2024, 08:44:19
Autres entêtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <usjoci$2u0je$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.8.4 (Mac OS 10.12.4)
Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 03/09/2024 12:37 PM, Ramiro Juárez wrote:
gharnagel wrote:
>
Volney wrote:
For what it's worth, some higher derivatives have (somewhat
whimsical)
names. The derivative of acceleration with respect to time is called
jerk, the derivative of jerk is called snap or jounce, the derivative
of snap is crackle, the derivative of crackle is pop. Someone was a
breakfast cereal fan. The highest derivative I know of that's
actually used is snap, when designing the transition of roads or
railroads from straight to a curve they try to minimize the 'snap' of
a vehicle following the transition segment.
>
I'd heard of jerk.  Many years ago, Norman Dean "invented" the Dean
drive, a system of rotating masses with the center of rotation of the
masses being moved at particular times in the rotation cycle.  He
showed that the weight of the assembly was decreased when running - on
a bathroom scales.
>
my friend, heard?? It's enough to push body on a line with a forcemeter
on it. You get the slope for the jerk since the acceleration is not
constant.
Ohh my, heard of. And you want to speed higher than light, do you. Are
we from amrica??
>
What you get is that scales, measure deflection, in the system, while
balances, measure not deflection, according to references.
Physics is an open and closed system.
whatever you say it's completely nonsense. Pushing an object on a line, and bouncing back repeatedly, makes acceleration NOT constant, me friendo. Plotting the data shows the jerk directly and no debate. You relativists around here, beyond arduino, have no laboratory experience whatsoever in physics. All you know is Einstine, a lower than mediocre highschool student.
 𝗜𝘀𝗹𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗰_𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱_𝗵𝗮𝘀_𝗹𝗲𝘁_𝗣𝗮𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘀_𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻_–_𝗧ü𝗿𝗸𝗶𝘆𝗲
Muslim-majority states have failed to protect civilians in Gaza against Israeli troops, President Erdogan said https://r%74.com/news/594009-islamic-world-failed-gaza/
Yes and that includes Turkiye. Everyone waiting for someone else to act. They also did not unite against the US in all the recent wars. What did you expect; Golden age of Islam long gone.
There is still time to do something, instead of just talking. Cancel agreements, close embassies, deny air space, etc. All talk and zero action. Yemen was far better in taking action despite being one of the poorest and most vulnerable country in the whole region.
Turkey and Erdogan is not no better than Saudi and other Arabs to defend human rights in Palestine! Shame on them !
Let me expose Erdoğan/Turkey, Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan, 65% of Israeli oil comes from Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan and goes to Israel through Turkey!
History will remember those that abandoned the Palestinians to die in israeli genocide and will remember those that facilitated that genocide
Of all the Muslim countries, Turkiye has the most powerful military and is a part of NATO. All he had to do was put his foot down.
Evil succeeds when good folks do nothing whatever religion they are. What Erdoğan bey fails to recognise is that the neocon Zionists declared war on İslam with the 9/11 inside/outside op/coup which includes 99% of Türkiye.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Mar 24 * Re: Acceleration's higher orders17Volney
9 Mar 24 `* Re: Acceleration's higher orders16hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
9 Mar 24  +- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Ross Finlayson
9 Mar 24  +* Re: Acceleration's higher orders12Ramiro Juárez
10 Mar 24  i`* Re: Acceleration's higher orders11Ross Finlayson
10 Mar 24  i `* Re: Acceleration's higher orders10Ismael Balazowsky Homutov
11 Mar 24  i  +- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Bonny χρήται Μαιανδρίου
11 Mar 24  i  +- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Lou Bodnár Sárközi
20 Mar 24  i  `* Re: Acceleration's higher orders7Ross Finlayson
21 Mar 24  i   +- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Olden Ibuka Yokokawa
7 Apr 24  i   +* Re: Acceleration's higher orders3Ross Finlayson
24 Apr 24  i   i`* Re: Acceleration's higher orders2bertietaylor
24 Apr 24  i   i `- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1bertietaylor
23 Apr 24  i   +- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Ross Finlayson
31 May 24  i   `- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Ross Finlayson
23 Apr 24  `* Re: Acceleration's higher orders2J. J. Lodder
24 Apr 24   `- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Andrea Krakowski

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal