Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
On 03/09/2024 12:37 PM, Ramiro Juárez wrote:whatever you say it's completely nonsense. Pushing an object on a line, and bouncing back repeatedly, makes acceleration NOT constant, me friendo. Plotting the data shows the jerk directly and no debate. You relativists around here, beyond arduino, have no laboratory experience whatsoever in physics. All you know is Einstine, a lower than mediocre highschool student.gharnagel wrote:>
>Volney wrote:>For what it's worth, some higher derivatives have (somewhat>
whimsical)
names. The derivative of acceleration with respect to time is called
jerk, the derivative of jerk is called snap or jounce, the derivative
of snap is crackle, the derivative of crackle is pop. Someone was a
breakfast cereal fan. The highest derivative I know of that's
actually used is snap, when designing the transition of roads or
railroads from straight to a curve they try to minimize the 'snap' of
a vehicle following the transition segment.
I'd heard of jerk. Many years ago, Norman Dean "invented" the Dean
drive, a system of rotating masses with the center of rotation of the
masses being moved at particular times in the rotation cycle. He
showed that the weight of the assembly was decreased when running - on
a bathroom scales.
my friend, heard?? It's enough to push body on a line with a forcemeter
on it. You get the slope for the jerk since the acceleration is not
constant.
Ohh my, heard of. And you want to speed higher than light, do you. Are
we from amrica??
What you get is that scales, measure deflection, in the system, while
balances, measure not deflection, according to references.
Physics is an open and closed system.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.