Re: Perfect clocks

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Perfect clocks
De : antir (at) *nospam* aniiii.hu (Britain Szabó)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Suivi-à : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Date : 04. May 2024, 20:14:55
Autres entêtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <v161ff$39qm3$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
Tom Roberts wrote:

On a GPS satellite, the usual definition of the second applies. But in
order for the SIGNALS from GPS satellites to be received on earth at the
correct frequencies, the time-base on the satellite must tick about 4
parts in 10^10 more slowly than a corresponding time-base on earth's
geoid (mean sea level).

monseneor, you misundrestand the entire procedure -it's not about the
signal propagation, but the difference in the gravity gradient. The signals
transmission are implied, but only after that.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Apr 24 * Perfect clocks45Maciej Wozniak
26 Apr 24 +* Re: Perfect clocks6Python
26 Apr 24 i`* Re: Perfect clocks5Maciej Wozniak
26 Apr 24 i `* Re: Perfect clocks4Python
26 Apr 24 i  `* Re: Perfect clocks3Python
26 Apr 24 i   `* Re: Perfect clocks2Python
26 Apr 24 i    `- Re: Perfect clocks1Kanyon Bazanov
26 Apr 24 `* Re: Perfect clocks38J. J. Lodder
26 Apr 24  +- Re: Perfect clocks1Ethan Wojewódzki
27 Apr 24  `* Re: Perfect clocks36J. J. Lodder
27 Apr 24   +- Re: Perfect clocks1Maciej Wozniak
27 Apr 24   `* Re: Perfect clocks34gharnagel
27 Apr 24    +- Re: Perfect clocks1Ross Finlayson
27 Apr 24    +* Re: Perfect clocks2Maciej Wozniak
28 Apr 24    i`- Re: Perfect clocks1gharnagel
28 Apr 24    `* Re: Perfect clocks30Mikko
28 Apr 24     +* Re: Perfect clocks25Maciej Wozniak
29 Apr 24     i`* Re: Perfect clocks24gharnagel
29 Apr 24     i `* Re: Perfect clocks23Maciej Wozniak
29 Apr 24     i  `* Re: Perfect clocks22gharnagel
29 Apr 24     i   `* Re: Perfect clocks21Maciej Wozniak
30 Apr 24     i    `* Re: Perfect clocks20gharnagel
1 May 24     i     `* Re: Perfect clocks19gharnagel
1 May 24     i      +* Re: Perfect clocks17Maciej Wozniak
1 May 24     i      i+- Re: Perfect clocks1Jeffie Miklós
4 May 24     i      i+* Re: Perfect clocks3gharnagel
6 May 24     i      ii`* Re: Perfect clocks2Volney
6 May 24     i      ii `- Re: Perfect clocks1Maciej Wozniak
4 May 24     i      i`* Re: Perfect clocks12Tom Roberts
4 May 24     i      i +* Re: Perfect clocks3Britain Szabó
5 May 24     i      i i`* Re: Perfect clocks2Edkah Stavropoulos
5 May 24     i      i i `- Re: Perfect clocks1FromTheRafters
6 May 24     i      i +* Re: Perfect clocks6gharnagel
6 May 24     i      i i`* Re: Perfect clocks5Maciej Wozniak
6 May 24     i      i i `* Re: Perfect clocks4gharnagel
6 May 24     i      i i  `* Re: Perfect clocks3Maciej Wozniak
6 May 24     i      i i   `* Re: Perfect clocks2gharnagel
7 May 24     i      i i    `- Re: Perfect clocks1King Tzekhmistrenko
6 May 24     i      i `* Re: Perfect clocks2Volney
6 May 24     i      i  `- Re: Perfect clocks1Zadbiel Csordás
1 May 24     i      `- Re: Perfect clocks1Everly Koustoubos
28 Apr 24     +- Re: Perfect clocks1Maciej Wozniak
28 Apr 24     `* Re: Perfect clocks3gharnagel
29 Apr 24      +- Re: Perfect clocks1Maciej Wozniak
29 Apr 24      `- Re: Perfect clocks1Mikko

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal