Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?

Liste des GroupesRevenir ร  p relativity 
Sujet : Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?
De : eaoa (at) *nospam* eeso.it (Mee'k Pagano Selvaggio)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Suivi-à : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Date : 29. Mar 2024, 15:16:00
Autres entรชtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <uu6if0$8h7v$3@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
Richard Hachel wrote:

For a long time now, I have provided proof that the theory of
relativity, at least as taught today, was incorrect.
I was then accused, for ideological convenience, of being
anti-relativist, which is false. I never said anywhere that the theory
of relativity was false, I simply said, and tenaciously, that it was
incorrect, which is far from being the same thing.

this is not true. Apparently the nazi Hitler kept them protected in red
bricks houses, vacation camps, with theater etc. Most of people are not
living in red bricks houses today. In 1800s they modified The Biblen, me
frendo, apparently.

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ_๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ผ๐˜_๐˜๐—ผ_๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น_6_๐—บ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป_๐—š๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€
https://bi%74%63%68%75te.com/video/Zvjc2ixWRi06

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ_๐—ก๐—ฆ_๐—–๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐˜€_๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ_๐—ก๐—ข๐—ง_๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต_๐—–๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐˜€,_๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ_25,_2024
https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/video/AsAOlElZebTN

๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—š๐—œ๐—ก_๐—ข๐—™_๐—ง๐—›๐—˜_๐—๐—˜๐—ช๐—ฆ_๐—ง๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ฒ_๐—๐—ฒ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ต_๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€_101
https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/GGHH3rvOvOaJ

Date Sujet#  Auteur
29 Mar 24 * [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?54Richard Hachel
29 Mar 24 +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Mee'k Pagano Selvaggio
30 Mar 24 +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?46Paul B. Andersen
30 Mar 24 i+- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Richard Hachel
30 Mar 24 i`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?44Richard Hachel
31 Mar 24 i `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?43Paul B. Andersen
31 Mar 24 i  +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?26Richard Hachel
31 Mar 24 i  i+* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?6Volney
31 Mar 24 i  ii`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?5Richard Hachel
31 Mar 24 i  ii +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Gaylord Chalyh Turubanov
2 Apr 24 i  ii `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Volney
2 Apr 24 i  ii  +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Mitchel Shirinkin Balahowski
2 Apr 24 i  ii  `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Ren Christakos Haritopoulos
1 Apr 24 i  i`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?19Paul B. Andersen
1 Apr 24 i  i `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?18Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i  i  `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?17Paul B. Andersen
2 Apr 24 i  i   +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?5Richard Hachel
3 Apr 24 i  i   i`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?4Maciej Wozniak
4 Apr 24 i  i   i `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Richard Hachel
4 Apr 24 i  i   i  +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Ross Finlayson
5 Apr 24 i  i   i  `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Paul B. Andersen
2 Apr 24 i  i   +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i  i   `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?10Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i  i    `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?9Python
2 Apr 24 i  i     +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Python
2 Apr 24 i  i     `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?7Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i  i      `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?6Python
3 Apr 24 i  i       `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?5Python
3 Apr 24 i  i        `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?4Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr 24 i  i         `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Python
4 Apr 24 i  i          `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?2Maciej Wozniak
4 Apr 24 i  i           `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Sammie Pรกsztor Buzรกs
31 Mar 24 i  `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?16Richard Hachel
31 Mar 24 i   +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?11Volney
31 Mar 24 i   i+- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Maciej Wozniak
31 Mar 24 i   i`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?9Richard Hachel
31 Mar 24 i   i +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?7Athel Cornish-Bowden
31 Mar 24 i   i i+* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?5Richard Hachel
1 Apr 24 i   i ii`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?4Athel Cornish-Bowden
1 Apr 24 i   i ii `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Richard Hachel
1 Apr 24 i   i ii  +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Athel Cornish-Bowden
2 Apr 24 i   i ii  `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Volney
1 Apr 24 i   i i`- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1gharnagel
2 Apr 24 i   i `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Volney
1 Apr 24 i   `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?4Paul B. Andersen
1 Apr 24 i    `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i     +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Paul B. Andersen
2 Apr 24 i     `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Volney
2 Apr 24 +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?4Arindam Banerjee
2 Apr 24 i`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Arindam Banerjee
2 Apr 24 i `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Arindam Banerjee
2 Apr 24 `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?2JanPB
2 Apr 24  `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Richard Hachel

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal